如何将MBTI类型转换为Socionics类型

转载自http://www.douban.com/group/topic/10099717/ 原文地址：http://www.socionics.com/articles/howto.htm How to convert MBTI® type to Socionics type 如何将MBTI类型转换为Socionics类型 14 April 2007 by Sergei Ganin Anyone who had closely read all the articles about Socionics and MBTI® theory compatibility issues has already got a fair idea that there is no straightforward conversion between the two systems. This obviously creates quite a lot of confusion, especially when it comes to the introvert types. The most common question people ask is: "Is MBTI INTJ the same as SocionicsINTp or Socionics INTj?" Some people have created the myth that if you change the last letter of the MBTI introvert type acronym to the opposite then you get a Socionics equivalent, i.e. MBTI INTJ = Socionics INTp. As I said, it is a myth and even though such conversion may work in some cases, it does not work in all cases. So here I'll try to show how to make such conversion possible without getting into too much trouble. 任何曾仔细阅读过Socionics与MBTI理论兼容性文章的人都会清楚地知道，无法在这两个系统间进行直接转换。很明显，这会造成许多混乱，尤其是在面对内向型时。人们最常问到的问题是：“MBTI中的INTJ与Socionics里的INTp/INTj是同一回事吗？”有些人则陷入迷思，以为将MBTI中内向类型的最后一个字母转换为它的反义字母，即可得到对应的Socionics类型，如：INTJ（在MBTI体系中的）=INTp（在Socionics中的）。依我说，这就是个误区，即使在有些情况下这样的转换得以成立，但并不意味着在所有的情况下它都成立。是以在此，我将试图阐明如何真正实现两种体系间的转换，而不至于惹出太多的麻烦。 The Thinking and Feeling pair of functions is bound together in the same way the Sensing and Intuition pair is. The two functions in a pair always go up against each or fight for the domination if you like. If one of the functions in a pair appears to be Dominant function then the other function in the same pair is Inferior and is well suppressed by the Dominant function, and the domination of the Dominant function is obvious. However, if one of the functions in a pair is Auxiliary, then the other would be Tertiary, which represents the Hidden Agenda. The Auxiliary and Tertiary combination of functions provokes a war between these functions, because there is no clear dominator. On one hand the Auxiliary function is much stronger than Tertiary, however the Tertiary function is the Hidden Agenda and is extremely important. So what happens in reality is that a person find it difficult to separate these two functions in order to give them clear preference, the functions always appear to be mixed up together to a certain degree. 思考与情感这一对功能捆绑在一起，同样的，感觉与直觉也是如此。这两对功能总是彼此对立，争夺主导权。如果一对功能中的一个成了主导功能，那么与它对立的功能即会沦为劣势功能（第四功能），主导功能的统治地位凸显。然而，如果一对功能中较强的一个是辅助功能，那么与它对立的那个则是沦为第三功能，表现为幕后进程（http://www.socionics.com/articles/hiddena.htm）。辅助功能与第三功能这对组合之间时有争战，分不出明显的胜负。一方面，辅助功能强于第三功能，然而，第三功能的幕后进程也同样相当强大。所以，事实上一个人无法真正将这对组合撇清，在它们中指出明确的偏好，在某种程度上，它们总是混在一块儿。 So, if a person's Auxiliary and Tertiary functions are Feeling and Thinking (or Thinking and Feeling), then such person find it hard to keep these two in peace and may find it difficult to decide whether they are F or T. The Dominant and Inferior in this case would be Sensing and Intuition (or Intuition and Sensing), and should be quite easy to separate. Because the Dominant function is Perceiving in this case, the person would be Socionics Perceiving type (XXXp). So if MBTI INTJ person is more uncertain about being T or F than S or N i.e. IN(T/F)J or INxJ, then he or she will correspond to Socionics INTp. 因此，如果一个人的辅助功能与第三功能是情感与思考（或思考与情感），他会发现很难让这两者和平相处，很难确定它们究竟哪个更强点儿。在这种情况下，作为主导功能与劣势功能的感觉与直觉（或直觉与感觉），则很容易区分。因为在这种情况下，主导功能是感知，而这个人将是Socionics中的P型（XXXp）。所以，如果一个MBTI中的INTJ对于他究竟属于T/F中的哪种，比之N/S这一维度上的结果更不确定，意即不知道究竟是IN（T/F）J或INxJ，那么他/她就相当于Socionics中的INTp。 If a person's Auxiliary and Tertiary functions are Sensing and Intuition (or Intuition and Sensing), then such person may find it difficult to keep these two in friendship and may find it hard to decide whether they are S or N. The Dominant and Inferior in this case would be Feeling and Thinking (or Thinking and Feeling), and should be quite easy to divide. Because in this case the Dominant function is Judging, the person would be Socionics Judging type (XXXj). So if MBTI INTJ person is more unsure about being S or N than T or F i.e. I(S/N)TJ or IxTJ, then he or she will correspond to Socionics INTj. 如果一个人的功能与第三功能是感觉与直觉（或直觉与感觉），那么他会发现让这两者保持友好，确定究竟哪个更强点儿也颇为困难。在这种情况下，作为主导功能与劣势功能的情感与思考（或思考与情感），则极易分别。因为在这种情况下，主导功能为判断，此人为Socionics中的J型人（XXXj）。所以，如果一个MBTI中的人对于他究竟更偏向于S/N，比之T/F这一维度上的结果更不确定，意即不明确究竟是I（S/N）TJ或IxTJ，那么他/她就相当于Socionics中的INTj。 So here it is all of the above simplified: 所以，上面所说的一切都简单了—— Unsure about being T or F -> you are Socionics XXXp Unsure about being S or N -> you are Socionics XXXj 不确定你到底是T/F——你是Socionics中的XXXp 不确定你到底是S/N——你是Socionics中的XXXj Alternatively if you would like a solid table of conversion between the two systems, you can use the table below: 或者你还是想要两种体系间根据功能维度转换得来的表格，那么就用下面这张好了—— Extroverts 外倾型 MBTI类型 Socionics类型 ENFJ ENFj ENTJ ENTj ENFP ENFp ENTP ENTp ESFJ ESFj ESTJ ESTj ESFP ESFp ESTP ESTp Introverts 内倾型 MBTI类型 Socionics类型 INFJ INFx INTJ INTx INFP INFx INTP INTx ISFJ ISFx ISTJ ISTx ISFP ISFx ISTP ISTx