CIETAC: An Amusing Solo

标题用中文说就是 我发现CIETAC唱了一台自说自话的大戏！
这两天由于筹备毕业论文 登陆了CIETAC网站 发现原来总会又将管辖权放给上海和华南分会了。
呵呵呵。何必呢，当初。
然后看了下他们家2015仲裁规则，甚是好玩：
QUOTE
第二条（六）当事人可以约定将争议提交仲裁委员会或仲裁委员会分会/仲裁中心进行仲裁；约定由仲裁委员会进行仲裁的，由仲裁委员会仲裁院接受仲裁申请并管理案件；约定由分会/仲裁中心仲裁的，由所约定的分会/仲裁中心仲裁院接受仲裁申请并管理案件。约定的分会/仲裁中心不存在、被终止授权或约定不明的，由仲裁委员会仲裁院接受仲裁申请并管理案件。如有争议，由仲裁委员会作出决定。
UNQUOTE.
注意了，尤其是最后一句。脑中飘过一句歌词：好寂寞。看看二中院14年底那个民事裁定书吧。网上随手搜了下，发现FF对此事也是够犀利的
QUOTE:
Do the 2015 Rules address the well-publicised split between CIETAC Beijing and its Shanghai and South China (Shenzhen) sub-commissions?
No. CIETAC’s former Shanghai and South China (Shenzhen) sub-commissions broke away from CIETAC in 2012, which led to conflicting court decisions on the jurisdiction of CIETAC’s former sub-commissions. The Supreme People’s Court subsequently introduced measures to ensure a consistent approach in dealing with similar cases, but uncertainties remain.
The 2015 Rules, however, do confirm that where an arbitration agreement provides for arbitration before the old CIETAC Shanghai or South China (Shenzhen) sub-commissions, the arbitration will fall under the jurisdiction of, and will be administered by, CIETAC (Beijing). However, this provision is not binding on the PRC courts, and it remains to be seen how the PRC courts will deal with this issue in the future.
UNQUOTE.
我倒是很感兴趣，要是日后某个分会闹独立，那么根据那个第二条第六款最后一小句话，法院会不会裁定CIETAC对此依然没有管辖权。
最后我要说，法院也真是的，管辖权固然相当重要，但是因为某个机构内杠造成管辖权一泡污，法院别着红袖章跑进来说 停一停停一停 仲裁庭没有管辖权不予执行哦。这岂不是更加一泡污嘛 =。-
Interesting.