认识论方法论基础读物（抛砖引玉）
不少人想知道我们当初方法论课的读物是哪些。我这边就抛砖引玉把当初的reading list列出来。仅供参考，如果有在其他地方读到的好的读物欢迎在回复里推荐。有志于做严肃科学工作者的，不论是社科还是理工都可以参考下。
该单出处：Aakhus, M. (2012) Research foundation course syllabus (COM 602), Rutgers University.
1 社科方法论概览【方法论是什么，能吃吗？】
Hammersley, M. (2011). Methodology: Who needs it? Newbury Park: Sage. Chapter 1.
2. 逻辑实证主义（以及行为主义心理学）【又名：曾经有人认为自然科学就是这个样子的，并且认为社会科学也可以这么玩】
Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Introduction, Part I, II, and III). 【科学哲学读物，前三章读完大部分人都会疯，没有耐心的话看其他几篇然后从本书第5章读起】
Watson, J. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review, 20. 【行为主义心理学之流的硬派社科简介】
Berger, C. (1977). The covering law perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 7-18.
3. 对逻辑实证主义的批判【又：真相其实不止一个】
Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Part V) 【如果上一篇里的三章你成功读完，第五章读起来会很舒服的，这一章基本就介绍当代科学认识论百花齐放的现状】
O'Keefe, D. (1975). Logical empiricism and the study of human communication. Speech Monographs, 42(3), 169- 183. 【论为什么用自然科学方法研究社会科学的是2B】
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Skinner's verbal behavior. Language, 35. 【论行为主义为什么是2B】
4. 社会科学的认知和话语转向（为什么我们要了解人在想什么）
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. New York: Polity Press. (Ch. 3 “The Phenomenological Input”) 【现象学和俗民方法学简介：为什么我们不了解其他人的想法但我们以为我们了解】
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick Description Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (pp. 3–30). New York 【“深描”，为什么研究社会光“看”是不够的】
Flyvberg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Chs. 7 “The significance of conflict and power to social science” & 9 “Methodological guidelines for a reformed social science”).
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Ch. 1 “The Task of Socio-Cultural Analysis”)
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Ch. 1 “The proper study of man”).
5. 制度建构和社会环境【篇篇都很精彩】
Searle, J. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1-22.
Simon, H. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (Third edition). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. (Ch. 1)
Bowker, G. & Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Opening and Concluding chapters).
Wertsch, J. (1998). Properties of Mediated Action. In J. Wertsch, Mind as Action (pp. 23-72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
6. 学术作为辩论的工具【论学术研究其实就是你死我活互相鄙视的吵架大赛以及如何做吵架王】
Toulmin, S. (2001). Return to reason. Harvard: Harvard University Press. (Chs. 5 & 6)
Schon, D. (19). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. (Ch. 1 “The Crisis of Confidence in Professional Knowledge”
Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending general linear reality. Sociological theory, 6, 169-186.
Jackson, S. (1989). Method as argument. B. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Jackson, S. (1986). Building a case for claims about discourse structure. In D. Ellis (Ed.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 129–147). Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ.
7. 如何设计一个学术研究（偏重实验法）
Jackson, S. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. New York: Guilford. (Ch. 1 pgs. 1-8, Ch. 8 pgs. 150-162, 159-162).
Copi, I. (1971). Causal connections: Mill’s method of experimental inquiry. In I. Copi, Introduction to logic (4th Edition). New York: MacMillan.
Campbell, D. & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Reprinted from N. L. Sage, Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Rand McNally & Company.
（后半学期的课程介绍各种研究方法，个人觉得没有什么太大意思，就不列出来了。）
该单出处：Aakhus, M. (2012) Research foundation course syllabus (COM 602), Rutgers University.
1 社科方法论概览【方法论是什么，能吃吗？】
Hammersley, M. (2011). Methodology: Who needs it? Newbury Park: Sage. Chapter 1.
2. 逻辑实证主义（以及行为主义心理学）【又名：曾经有人认为自然科学就是这个样子的，并且认为社会科学也可以这么玩】
Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Introduction, Part I, II, and III). 【科学哲学读物，前三章读完大部分人都会疯，没有耐心的话看其他几篇然后从本书第5章读起】
Watson, J. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review, 20. 【行为主义心理学之流的硬派社科简介】
Berger, C. (1977). The covering law perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 7-18.
3. 对逻辑实证主义的批判【又：真相其实不止一个】
Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Part V) 【如果上一篇里的三章你成功读完，第五章读起来会很舒服的，这一章基本就介绍当代科学认识论百花齐放的现状】
O'Keefe, D. (1975). Logical empiricism and the study of human communication. Speech Monographs, 42(3), 169- 183. 【论为什么用自然科学方法研究社会科学的是2B】
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Skinner's verbal behavior. Language, 35. 【论行为主义为什么是2B】
4. 社会科学的认知和话语转向（为什么我们要了解人在想什么）
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. New York: Polity Press. (Ch. 3 “The Phenomenological Input”) 【现象学和俗民方法学简介：为什么我们不了解其他人的想法但我们以为我们了解】
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick Description Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (pp. 3–30). New York 【“深描”，为什么研究社会光“看”是不够的】
Flyvberg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Chs. 7 “The significance of conflict and power to social science” & 9 “Methodological guidelines for a reformed social science”).
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Ch. 1 “The Task of Socio-Cultural Analysis”)
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Ch. 1 “The proper study of man”).
5. 制度建构和社会环境【篇篇都很精彩】
Searle, J. (2005). What is an institution? Journal of Institutional Economics, 1(1), 1-22.
Simon, H. (2001). The sciences of the artificial (Third edition). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. (Ch. 1)
Bowker, G. & Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Opening and Concluding chapters).
Wertsch, J. (1998). Properties of Mediated Action. In J. Wertsch, Mind as Action (pp. 23-72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
6. 学术作为辩论的工具【论学术研究其实就是你死我活互相鄙视的吵架大赛以及如何做吵架王】
Toulmin, S. (2001). Return to reason. Harvard: Harvard University Press. (Chs. 5 & 6)
Schon, D. (19). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. (Ch. 1 “The Crisis of Confidence in Professional Knowledge”
Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending general linear reality. Sociological theory, 6, 169-186.
Jackson, S. (1989). Method as argument. B. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of Argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
Jackson, S. (1986). Building a case for claims about discourse structure. In D. Ellis (Ed.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 129–147). Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ.
7. 如何设计一个学术研究（偏重实验法）
Jackson, S. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. New York: Guilford. (Ch. 1 pgs. 1-8, Ch. 8 pgs. 150-162, 159-162).
Copi, I. (1971). Causal connections: Mill’s method of experimental inquiry. In I. Copi, Introduction to logic (4th Edition). New York: MacMillan.
Campbell, D. & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Reprinted from N. L. Sage, Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Rand McNally & Company.
（后半学期的课程介绍各种研究方法，个人觉得没有什么太大意思，就不列出来了。）
