《为什么在经济危机中创业？》
虽然现在经济危机在西方已经愈演愈烈。但在亚洲，尤其在中国这几年经济强势下，普通民众对这场全球范围的经济危机大都风闻目前还无切身体会。即还无真正影响日常生活。
但这场危机汹涌而来，很多人已经担心明年国内经济的走向。经济部门官员说已做好充分准备迎接挑战，可一旦危机真正侵入中国市场，影响必然方方面面。作为没有一定财富积蓄的普通民众如何应对危机？
我已经听到不少人在说三句口诀：“没工作的尽快找，有工作的不辞职，没保证的不跳槽”。尽管如此，谁也不能担保自己一定能顺利度过危机。2009中国大学毕业生将达到令人目眩的610万人，根据供缺预测，明年大概会有200万人失业。竞争进一步加大。使得上面说的应对方法似乎成了消极抵抗。
上个月，Paul Graham发话，讲到自己如何看待危机，如何应对危机。文中着重谈到要积极的应对危机，在“危机中创业”，“在危机中寻找机会”。
看完这篇文章后有2点体会：
1.Paul Graham的态度还是“乐观”的，在给所有的民众一份信心。
2.当具体谈到创业时，paul重点提到的主要人群是拥有一定技能的人员，即具有竞争优势的人。而普通人群似乎无可避免都要在危机中挣扎。
但虽如此，这篇文章读完还是能小小的振奋一下人心，即便读者是不具竞争优势者，即便没有创业能力。因为正如Paul Graham所说：“the time to act is always now”。
无论在哪里，一个人做与不做是不一样的。积极应对总比消极躲避要有收获。
下文译者为：阮一峰
《Why to Start a Startup in a Bad Economy？》
为什么在经济危机中创业？
作者：Paul Graham
原文网址：http://www.paulgraham.com/badeconomy.html
发表时间：2008年10月
The economic situation is apparently so grim that some experts fear we may be in for a stretch as bad as the mid seventies.
现在的经济状况，明显很糟糕。一些专家担忧，我们大概免不了会有一段像70年代中期那样的苦日子了。
When Microsoft and Apple were founded.
微软公司和苹果公司就是在70年代中期成立的。
As those examples suggest, a recession may not be such a bad time to start a startup. I'm not claiming it's a particularly good time either. The truth is more boring: the state of the economy doesn't matter much either way.
这个事实表明，对于创业者来说，经济衰退也许并不是那么糟。当然，我不是说，经济衰退有利于创业。真相说出来，可能会让人失望：宏观经济的变化，对创业能否成功影响不大。
If we've learned one thing from funding so many startups, it's that they succeed or fail based on the qualities of the founders. The economy has some effect, certainly, but as a predictor of success it's rounding error compared to the founders.
在过去的日子中，我们对许多创业公司进行了投资。我们发现这些公司能否成功，取决于创业者的素质。宏观经济肯定有一些影响，但是起决定作用的是创业者。
Which means that what matters is who you are, not when you do it. If you're the right sort of person, you'll win even in a bad economy. And if you're not, a good economy won't save you. Someone who thinks "I better not start a startup now, because the economy is so bad" is making the same mistake as the people who thought during the Bubble "all I have to do is start a startup, and I'll be rich."
这就是说，真正重要的是你这个人，而不是你何时动手。如果你本人的素质过硬，在经济危机中你也能成功。如果你本人的素质不行，即使经济一片繁荣，也救不了你。有些人的想法是“经济状况这么糟，我最好避免在这个时候创业”。这种想法的误导性，不亚于在经济泡沫时期某些人的想法，“我只要赶上这个时候创业，就能发财”。
So if you want to improve your chances, you should think far more about who you can recruit as a cofounder than the state of the economy. And if you're worried about threats to the survival of your company, don't look for them in the news. Look in the mirror.
所以，如果你想增加成功的机会，你不应该去想经济状况的好坏，而应该花大量时候考虑，你能找到谁跟你一起创业。如果你担心你的公司会因为某种原因倒闭，请不要去看电视新闻，你只要照照镜子就够了。
But for any given team of founders, would it not pay to wait till the economy is better before taking the leap? If you're starting a restaurant, maybe, but not if you're working on technology. Technology progresses more or less independently of the stock market. So for any given idea, the payoff for acting fast in a bad economy will be higher than for waiting. Microsoft's first product was a Basic interpreter for the Altair. That was exactly what the world needed in 1975, but if Gates and Allen had decided to wait a few years, it would have been too late.
但是，对于任何创业团队来说，等到经济状况好转时再动手，难道不是一个合理的建议吗？如果你开的是一家餐馆，那么有可能是这样的。但是如果在技术领域，答案就不是这样。技术进步同股票市场的关系不大。如果你有好的想法，早动手比晚动手的回报更大。微软公司的第一个产品，是供Altair计算机使用的Basic语言解释器。这正是市场在1975年需要的产品。假如比尔盖茨和艾伦（注释：微软的另一个创立者）决定等几年再动手，那就会太迟了。
Of course, the idea you have now won't be the last you have. There are always new ideas. But if you have a specific idea you want to act on, act now.
当然，你现在的想法不等于你将来的想法。但是如果你很确定，现在就想做一件事，那么就不要等。
That doesn't mean you can ignore the economy. Both customers and investors will be feeling pinched. It's not necessarily a problem if customers feel pinched: you may even be able to benefit from it, by making things that save money. Startups often make things cheaper, so in that respect they're better positioned to prosper in a recession than big companies.
我不是说，你可以完全不管宏观经济。衰退会使得你的投资者和你的顾客，都感到手头拮据。但是，顾客感到手头拮据，其实不是问题，反而你可以从中获利，因为顾客需要更便宜的商品。一般来说，创业公司的产品，总是比原有产品更便宜。所以从这个角度看，在经济危机中，小的创业公司比大公司更容易成功。
Investors are more of a problem. Startups generally need to raise some amount of external funding, and investors tend to be less willing to invest in bad times. They shouldn't be. Everyone knows you're supposed to buy when times are bad and sell when times are good. But of course what makes investing so counterintuitive is that in equity markets, good times are defined as everyone thinking it's time to buy. You have to be a contrarian to be correct, and by definition only a minority of investors can be.
投资者不愿投资，这是一个大的问题。创业公司通常都需要一定数量的外部融资。在经济危机中，投资者倾向于不投资。但是，他们其实是错的。所有人都知道，成功投资的秘诀是，危机时买入，泡沫时卖出。但是，这就使得投资不能依靠直觉。因为在股票市场中，牛市的定义就是每个人都认为现在应该买入。如果你想正确投资，你就必须成为一个反向投资者。但是大多数人做不到这一点。
So just as investors in 1999 were tripping over one another trying to buy into lousy startups, investors in 2009 will presumably be reluctant to invest even in good ones.
所以，毫不奇怪，1999年互联网泡沫，大多数投资者会竞相买入不可靠的互联网公司。那么在2009年，投资者也会对优秀的互联网公司犹豫不前。
You'll have to adapt to this. But that's nothing new: startups always have to adapt to the whims of investors. Ask any founder in any economy if they'd describe investors as fickle, and watch the face they make. Last year you had to be prepared to explain how your startup was viral. Next year you'll have to explain how it's recession-proof.
你得习惯这一点。不过，这不算新鲜事，创业公司永远都必须去习惯那些变化无常的投资者。你随便找一个创业者去问一下，看看他们有没有抱怨投资者，有没有面露难色。前一年，你还不得不跟投资者解释，你的公司如何具备快速发展的潜力。转眼第二年，你又不得不跟他们解释，你的公司如何能够抵抗衰退。
(Those are both good things to be. The mistake investors make is not the criteria they use but that they always tend to focus on one to the exclusion of the rest.)
（这些都不能算错。投资者的错误，并不是他们选择投资的标准，而是他们总是只看到一种可能，而忽略了其他可能。）
Fortunately the way to make a startup recession-proof is to do exactly what you should do anyway: run it as cheaply as possible. For years I've been telling founders that the surest route to success is to be the cockroaches of the corporate world. The immediate cause of death in a startup is always running out of money. The cheaper your company is to operate, the harder it is to kill. Fortunately it has gotten very cheap to run a startup, and a recession will if anything make it cheaper still.
幸运的是，不管宏观经济的好坏，防止衰退是你总归要做的事情。你总归必须尽量减少公司运营的成本。多年来，我一直告诉创业者，最可靠的成功途径，就是在公司丛林中，做一只最低等的蟑螂。一旦现金告罄，创业公司就会立即死亡。你的公司运营成本越低，死亡的可能性就越小。幸运的是，创立一家公司其实花费不多，而且经济危机会使得，公司的运行成本变得更低。
If nuclear winter really is here, it may be safer to be a cockroach even than to keep your job. Customers may drop off individually if they can no longer afford you, but you're not going to lose them all at once; markets don't "reduce headcount."
就算发生真正的经济寒冬，做一只开着小公司的蟑螂，可能也比为别人打工更安全。你的客户可能因为付不出钱，而放弃你，但是你不会一会子失去全部的客户。但是如果你为别人打工，就可能被“一次性裁员”。
What if you quit your job to start a startup that fails, and you can't find another? That could be a problem if you work in sales or marketing. In those fields it can take months to find a new job in a bad economy. But hackers seem to be more liquid. Good hackers can always get some kind of job. It might not be your dream job, but you're not going to starve.
要是你辞职创业，结果创业失败，你找不到工作，那可怎么办？如果你是销售或者市场人员，这可能是一个问题。在经济危机时，找到一份新的销售工作，会花掉几个月。但是，技术人员的流动性看上去更高一些。好的工程师总是能找到工作的。你也许对新工作感到不满意，但是至少你不会饿死。
Another advantage of bad times is that there's less competition. Technology trains leave the station at regular intervals. If everyone else is cowering in a corner, you may have a whole car to yourself.
经济危机还有另外一个优点，那就是竞争变小了。技术革新的列车，总是定时从车站发出。如果有人蜷缩在墙角，不肯上车，那么整节车厢可能只有你一人搭乘。
You're an investor too. As a founder, you're buying stock with work: the reason Larry and Sergey are so rich is not so much that they've done work worth tens of billions of dollars, but that they were the first investors in Google. And like any investor you should buy when times are bad.
你本人也是一个投资者。作为创始人，你就是用工作在买入你自己的股票。为什么Google的创始人Larry和Sergey那么富有？原因并非他们的工作创造出了几百亿美元，而是他们是Google的第一批投资者。同其他投资者应该做的一样，你也应该在经济不景气时买入股票。
Were you nodding in agreement, thinking "stupid investors" a few paragraphs ago when I was talking about how investors are reluctant to put money into startups in bad markets, even though that's the time they should rationally be most willing to buy? Well, founders aren't much better. When times get bad, hackers go to grad school. And no doubt that will happen this time too. In fact, what makes the preceding paragraph true is that most readers won't believe it—at least to the extent of acting on it.
前几段我提到，有些“愚蠢的投资者”一看到经济不景气，就不愿意投资，即使那正是他们最应该买的时候。你有没有点头表示同意？不过，创业者也好不到哪里去。经济衰退来临时，黑客们会去读研究生。这次无疑也是这样。事实上，上一段能够成立的理由，正是在于大多数读者不相信这一点，至少不会在行动上实践。
So maybe a recession is a good time to start a startup. It's hard to say whether advantages like lack of competition outweigh disadvantages like reluctant investors. But it doesn't matter much either way. It's the people that matter. And for a given set of people working on a given technology, the time to act is always now.
所以，经济衰退可能正是创业的大好时机。缺少竞争是有利因素，犹豫的投资者是不利因素，很难说哪个因素份量更重一点。但是说实话，它们都不重要。重要的是人。对于那些已经掌握技术的人来说，行动的时间永远是现在。
但这场危机汹涌而来，很多人已经担心明年国内经济的走向。经济部门官员说已做好充分准备迎接挑战，可一旦危机真正侵入中国市场，影响必然方方面面。作为没有一定财富积蓄的普通民众如何应对危机？
我已经听到不少人在说三句口诀：“没工作的尽快找，有工作的不辞职，没保证的不跳槽”。尽管如此，谁也不能担保自己一定能顺利度过危机。2009中国大学毕业生将达到令人目眩的610万人，根据供缺预测，明年大概会有200万人失业。竞争进一步加大。使得上面说的应对方法似乎成了消极抵抗。
上个月，Paul Graham发话，讲到自己如何看待危机，如何应对危机。文中着重谈到要积极的应对危机，在“危机中创业”，“在危机中寻找机会”。
看完这篇文章后有2点体会：
1.Paul Graham的态度还是“乐观”的，在给所有的民众一份信心。
2.当具体谈到创业时，paul重点提到的主要人群是拥有一定技能的人员，即具有竞争优势的人。而普通人群似乎无可避免都要在危机中挣扎。
但虽如此，这篇文章读完还是能小小的振奋一下人心，即便读者是不具竞争优势者，即便没有创业能力。因为正如Paul Graham所说：“the time to act is always now”。
无论在哪里，一个人做与不做是不一样的。积极应对总比消极躲避要有收获。
下文译者为：阮一峰
《Why to Start a Startup in a Bad Economy？》
为什么在经济危机中创业？
作者：Paul Graham
原文网址：http://www.paulgraham.com/badeconomy.html
发表时间：2008年10月
 |
The economic situation is apparently so grim that some experts fear we may be in for a stretch as bad as the mid seventies.
现在的经济状况，明显很糟糕。一些专家担忧，我们大概免不了会有一段像70年代中期那样的苦日子了。
When Microsoft and Apple were founded.
微软公司和苹果公司就是在70年代中期成立的。
As those examples suggest, a recession may not be such a bad time to start a startup. I'm not claiming it's a particularly good time either. The truth is more boring: the state of the economy doesn't matter much either way.
这个事实表明，对于创业者来说，经济衰退也许并不是那么糟。当然，我不是说，经济衰退有利于创业。真相说出来，可能会让人失望：宏观经济的变化，对创业能否成功影响不大。
If we've learned one thing from funding so many startups, it's that they succeed or fail based on the qualities of the founders. The economy has some effect, certainly, but as a predictor of success it's rounding error compared to the founders.
在过去的日子中，我们对许多创业公司进行了投资。我们发现这些公司能否成功，取决于创业者的素质。宏观经济肯定有一些影响，但是起决定作用的是创业者。
Which means that what matters is who you are, not when you do it. If you're the right sort of person, you'll win even in a bad economy. And if you're not, a good economy won't save you. Someone who thinks "I better not start a startup now, because the economy is so bad" is making the same mistake as the people who thought during the Bubble "all I have to do is start a startup, and I'll be rich."
这就是说，真正重要的是你这个人，而不是你何时动手。如果你本人的素质过硬，在经济危机中你也能成功。如果你本人的素质不行，即使经济一片繁荣，也救不了你。有些人的想法是“经济状况这么糟，我最好避免在这个时候创业”。这种想法的误导性，不亚于在经济泡沫时期某些人的想法，“我只要赶上这个时候创业，就能发财”。
So if you want to improve your chances, you should think far more about who you can recruit as a cofounder than the state of the economy. And if you're worried about threats to the survival of your company, don't look for them in the news. Look in the mirror.
所以，如果你想增加成功的机会，你不应该去想经济状况的好坏，而应该花大量时候考虑，你能找到谁跟你一起创业。如果你担心你的公司会因为某种原因倒闭，请不要去看电视新闻，你只要照照镜子就够了。
But for any given team of founders, would it not pay to wait till the economy is better before taking the leap? If you're starting a restaurant, maybe, but not if you're working on technology. Technology progresses more or less independently of the stock market. So for any given idea, the payoff for acting fast in a bad economy will be higher than for waiting. Microsoft's first product was a Basic interpreter for the Altair. That was exactly what the world needed in 1975, but if Gates and Allen had decided to wait a few years, it would have been too late.
但是，对于任何创业团队来说，等到经济状况好转时再动手，难道不是一个合理的建议吗？如果你开的是一家餐馆，那么有可能是这样的。但是如果在技术领域，答案就不是这样。技术进步同股票市场的关系不大。如果你有好的想法，早动手比晚动手的回报更大。微软公司的第一个产品，是供Altair计算机使用的Basic语言解释器。这正是市场在1975年需要的产品。假如比尔盖茨和艾伦（注释：微软的另一个创立者）决定等几年再动手，那就会太迟了。
Of course, the idea you have now won't be the last you have. There are always new ideas. But if you have a specific idea you want to act on, act now.
当然，你现在的想法不等于你将来的想法。但是如果你很确定，现在就想做一件事，那么就不要等。
That doesn't mean you can ignore the economy. Both customers and investors will be feeling pinched. It's not necessarily a problem if customers feel pinched: you may even be able to benefit from it, by making things that save money. Startups often make things cheaper, so in that respect they're better positioned to prosper in a recession than big companies.
我不是说，你可以完全不管宏观经济。衰退会使得你的投资者和你的顾客，都感到手头拮据。但是，顾客感到手头拮据，其实不是问题，反而你可以从中获利，因为顾客需要更便宜的商品。一般来说，创业公司的产品，总是比原有产品更便宜。所以从这个角度看，在经济危机中，小的创业公司比大公司更容易成功。
Investors are more of a problem. Startups generally need to raise some amount of external funding, and investors tend to be less willing to invest in bad times. They shouldn't be. Everyone knows you're supposed to buy when times are bad and sell when times are good. But of course what makes investing so counterintuitive is that in equity markets, good times are defined as everyone thinking it's time to buy. You have to be a contrarian to be correct, and by definition only a minority of investors can be.
投资者不愿投资，这是一个大的问题。创业公司通常都需要一定数量的外部融资。在经济危机中，投资者倾向于不投资。但是，他们其实是错的。所有人都知道，成功投资的秘诀是，危机时买入，泡沫时卖出。但是，这就使得投资不能依靠直觉。因为在股票市场中，牛市的定义就是每个人都认为现在应该买入。如果你想正确投资，你就必须成为一个反向投资者。但是大多数人做不到这一点。
So just as investors in 1999 were tripping over one another trying to buy into lousy startups, investors in 2009 will presumably be reluctant to invest even in good ones.
所以，毫不奇怪，1999年互联网泡沫，大多数投资者会竞相买入不可靠的互联网公司。那么在2009年，投资者也会对优秀的互联网公司犹豫不前。
You'll have to adapt to this. But that's nothing new: startups always have to adapt to the whims of investors. Ask any founder in any economy if they'd describe investors as fickle, and watch the face they make. Last year you had to be prepared to explain how your startup was viral. Next year you'll have to explain how it's recession-proof.
你得习惯这一点。不过，这不算新鲜事，创业公司永远都必须去习惯那些变化无常的投资者。你随便找一个创业者去问一下，看看他们有没有抱怨投资者，有没有面露难色。前一年，你还不得不跟投资者解释，你的公司如何具备快速发展的潜力。转眼第二年，你又不得不跟他们解释，你的公司如何能够抵抗衰退。
(Those are both good things to be. The mistake investors make is not the criteria they use but that they always tend to focus on one to the exclusion of the rest.)
（这些都不能算错。投资者的错误，并不是他们选择投资的标准，而是他们总是只看到一种可能，而忽略了其他可能。）
Fortunately the way to make a startup recession-proof is to do exactly what you should do anyway: run it as cheaply as possible. For years I've been telling founders that the surest route to success is to be the cockroaches of the corporate world. The immediate cause of death in a startup is always running out of money. The cheaper your company is to operate, the harder it is to kill. Fortunately it has gotten very cheap to run a startup, and a recession will if anything make it cheaper still.
幸运的是，不管宏观经济的好坏，防止衰退是你总归要做的事情。你总归必须尽量减少公司运营的成本。多年来，我一直告诉创业者，最可靠的成功途径，就是在公司丛林中，做一只最低等的蟑螂。一旦现金告罄，创业公司就会立即死亡。你的公司运营成本越低，死亡的可能性就越小。幸运的是，创立一家公司其实花费不多，而且经济危机会使得，公司的运行成本变得更低。
If nuclear winter really is here, it may be safer to be a cockroach even than to keep your job. Customers may drop off individually if they can no longer afford you, but you're not going to lose them all at once; markets don't "reduce headcount."
就算发生真正的经济寒冬，做一只开着小公司的蟑螂，可能也比为别人打工更安全。你的客户可能因为付不出钱，而放弃你，但是你不会一会子失去全部的客户。但是如果你为别人打工，就可能被“一次性裁员”。
What if you quit your job to start a startup that fails, and you can't find another? That could be a problem if you work in sales or marketing. In those fields it can take months to find a new job in a bad economy. But hackers seem to be more liquid. Good hackers can always get some kind of job. It might not be your dream job, but you're not going to starve.
要是你辞职创业，结果创业失败，你找不到工作，那可怎么办？如果你是销售或者市场人员，这可能是一个问题。在经济危机时，找到一份新的销售工作，会花掉几个月。但是，技术人员的流动性看上去更高一些。好的工程师总是能找到工作的。你也许对新工作感到不满意，但是至少你不会饿死。
Another advantage of bad times is that there's less competition. Technology trains leave the station at regular intervals. If everyone else is cowering in a corner, you may have a whole car to yourself.
经济危机还有另外一个优点，那就是竞争变小了。技术革新的列车，总是定时从车站发出。如果有人蜷缩在墙角，不肯上车，那么整节车厢可能只有你一人搭乘。
You're an investor too. As a founder, you're buying stock with work: the reason Larry and Sergey are so rich is not so much that they've done work worth tens of billions of dollars, but that they were the first investors in Google. And like any investor you should buy when times are bad.
你本人也是一个投资者。作为创始人，你就是用工作在买入你自己的股票。为什么Google的创始人Larry和Sergey那么富有？原因并非他们的工作创造出了几百亿美元，而是他们是Google的第一批投资者。同其他投资者应该做的一样，你也应该在经济不景气时买入股票。
Were you nodding in agreement, thinking "stupid investors" a few paragraphs ago when I was talking about how investors are reluctant to put money into startups in bad markets, even though that's the time they should rationally be most willing to buy? Well, founders aren't much better. When times get bad, hackers go to grad school. And no doubt that will happen this time too. In fact, what makes the preceding paragraph true is that most readers won't believe it—at least to the extent of acting on it.
前几段我提到，有些“愚蠢的投资者”一看到经济不景气，就不愿意投资，即使那正是他们最应该买的时候。你有没有点头表示同意？不过，创业者也好不到哪里去。经济衰退来临时，黑客们会去读研究生。这次无疑也是这样。事实上，上一段能够成立的理由，正是在于大多数读者不相信这一点，至少不会在行动上实践。
So maybe a recession is a good time to start a startup. It's hard to say whether advantages like lack of competition outweigh disadvantages like reluctant investors. But it doesn't matter much either way. It's the people that matter. And for a given set of people working on a given technology, the time to act is always now.
所以，经济衰退可能正是创业的大好时机。缺少竞争是有利因素，犹豫的投资者是不利因素，很难说哪个因素份量更重一点。但是说实话，它们都不重要。重要的是人。对于那些已经掌握技术的人来说，行动的时间永远是现在。
还没人转发这篇日记
