2006年5月27日：一些人认为动物实验是残酷的，另外一些人认为这是科学发展所必须的，你是啥意见？

                
                
修改后：
    The use of animals for experimentation purpose is a frequent topic of discussion.
Pros:
1. We can find a plenty of evidence to support the view that we should not use the animals for experiment. Not only people but also animals are owner of the world. People should not do experiment on animals for themselves.
2. Most of the experiment animals live a lonely life. Some monkeys for experiment have never seen other monkeys in their whole life and as a result they died in hopeless. The last moment of their poor life is full of miserableness.
3. In my opinion, the most of animal experiments are not necessary. Although the gene is similar between man and monkey, they are not completely same. In spite of the animals, the man should make the experiment by themselves once more.
4. Thousands of years ago, human and monkeys were brothers. Today we use monkeys for experiment, which is ridiculous and equals to kill our brothers.
Cons：
1. The experiment animals’ living condition is much better than the wild. They live in clean rooms, where there is sufficient food for them. They even have some toys. The experiment animals live a longer life than the wild animals.
2. The most of animal testing are necessary for the development of new drugs. Without animals for experimentation people cannot make new medicine. If we cannot deal with disease, a large number of people and animals will die in vain.
3. All the animals for the experiment purpose are raised in lab. It does not disturb the balance of the nature. With the rapid development of science, people will find some other methods to substitute for animal experiment such as digital engineering or genetically engineering.
※ as a result 表因果关系的连接词
※ In spite of
※ ThousandS of years ago 注意是几千年来，thousand 要加S
※ ridiculous 注意拼写
※ experimentation n.实验 experiment n. vi.
※ the development of new drugs
※ genetically engineering 基因工程注意前者拼写
※ animal testing, Animal experimentation, Animal experiment
※ even if 即使，表转折关系
※ raised adj. 凸起的；发酵的；浮雕的 v. 提高（raise的过去时和过去分词）；举起；抚育，抚养
※ substitute n.替代品
原文：
   The use of animals for experimentation purpose is a frequent topic of discussion.
Pros:
1. We can find a plenty of evidence to support the view that we should not use the animals for experiences. Not only the people but also the animals are owner of the world. People should not do it for themselves.
2. Most of experiment animals live a lonely life. Some monkeys for experiment have never seen other monkeys in their whole life as a result they died in hopeless. There are some miserable during the last moment in their poor life.
3. In my opinion, it is unnecessary for the most of animals for experimentation purpose. Although the gene is similar between man and monkey, they are not completely same. In spite of the animals, the man should make the experiment by themselves once more.
4. Thousands of years ago, human and monkeys were brothers. Today we use monkey for experiment that equals to kill our brothers. That is ridiculous thing.
Cons：
1. The experiment animals living condition is much better than the field. They live in clean rooms. There is sufficient food for them. Even if they have some toys. The experiment animals live a longer life than the wild animals.
2. The most of animal testing are necessary for the development of new drugs. Without the animals for the experimentation the people cannot make new medicine for illness. If we cannot deal with the disease, a large number of people and animals will die in vain.
3. All the animals for the experiment purpose are raise in the lab. It does not disturb the balance of the nature. With the rapid development of science and technology, we will find other method for the animal experimentation such as digitize or genetically engineering.
    我有许多年没写过这种东西了，写作过程比较痛苦，文法错误应该不会太少。欢迎英语好的同学猛烈拍砖——帮忙挑挑毛病。