从神经科学的角度来看，宗教和科学是否在本质上属于同一个系统

Thought about religion and neuroscience，持续 4 秒

从神经科学角度看，宗教信仰和科学思维确实都依赖于大脑对信息的处理与解释，在某些认知与情感区域可能会出现相似的神经活动（如对意义感、因果推理的敏感度等）。然而科学主要依赖可验证的经验数据与逻辑推理，宗教则更多基于信仰、象征与超验体验，其背后激活的神经网络模式和决策机制有明显差异。因此，两者并不能被视为同一个系统。

Examining neural signatures

This question points to an inquiry into the neuro-mathematical patterns of neural network activation, focusing on Activation Mode and Network types, and considering fMRI/EEG signals.

Utilizing mathematical tools

I’m mapping out a model to analyze neural activity as high-dimensional time series data, examining functional connectivity patterns, and comparing them using clustering coefficients, betweenness centrality, and modular structures.

Mapping neural networks

OK, let me see. The "religious" condition leans on the default mode network, boosting self-referential thinking. Meanwhile, the 'scientific' condition relies more on the central executive network for problem-solving.

Analyzing connectivity dynamics

Taking a closer look at how differences in connectivity matrices, activation state distributions, Bayesian prior weighting, and network topology impact the dynamic timescale in neural networks.