2019年春季罗祎楠老师《政府组织与治理模式：跨学科视野与理论能力训练》课程大纲

上课时间：周五14:00--16:35

上课地点：北京大学政府管理学院502

办公室：清华大学公共管理学院423

答疑时间 (提前预约)：周五课后

课程基本目的和形式

如何扩展和深化中国治理研究的理论构建？从事政治学与公共管理学习的研究生如何提高自身理论分析水平和理论综述写作能力？完成这些目标，需要在学养累积中，超越单一学科中层理论的局限，在跨学科的理论视角整合中，不断扩展学者的理论想象力和理论构建能力。本课程代表了这样的努力。

本课程教学内容涵盖政治学与社会学中与“治理”相关的基本理论。教学目标：1）培养研究生的跨学科理论素养和理论想象力2）理论综述性论文写作能力。具体包括：

从政治学与社会学全面理解什么是理论；

奠定研究生从事治理研究的基本理论知识；

学会抓住理论文章中重要的理论点；

学会通过理论文本的细读（close reading）理解理论内涵的复杂性；

通过泛读发现理论间如何对话；

学习如何在方法论指导下将经验研究上升为理论；

并最终将上述理解落实于扎实的理论综述性文章写作中的能力。

课程阅读和讨论部分为四大板块：

1） 方法论：通过讲授和讨论，学生理解社会科学质性研究和定量研究的主要方法论流派对理论的不同理解及其在理论化方式上的差异。理解经验研究必须通过自恰的方法论逻辑才可以上升到理论。

2） 理论视角：这一模块涵盖八大理论视角。包括：个体、制度结构、过程机制、国家、发展、文化、权力、匹配。课上要求每组同学对自己的阅读作细致的梳理，并给全体同学做报告。教师会随时引导提问。这一阶段我们希望加深学生对理论逻辑复杂性的认识。

3）中层理论：这一模块涵盖政治学和社会学与中国治理相关的各分支领域的中层理论。包括五个部分：政体差异与转型、社会治理、国家建构、发展的政治经济学、福利国家与再分配的政治经济学。这一学习阶段为理论泛读阶段。结合阅读文献，老师在课上提出问题，学生参与讨论。这一阶段我们希望引导学生学会如何迅速抓住理论间对话要点。

4）理论综述写作训练

课程主要培养学生写作理论综述文章。这是研究生论文的理论部分所必须的能力。好的文章需要在反复讨论中不断打磨。本课程提供这样的训练机会。课程将提供理论综述文章范本，组织学生讨论文章写作方式。我们还将用2-3次课程循序渐进的指导学生写作理论综述文章，并不断打磨成令人满意的文章。在这样的过程中，引导学生逐渐领会如何将思考落实到写作之中。

课程要求

本课程的顺利展开有赖于学生的积极参与和认真投入，而兴趣是最好的老师。除非有特殊情况，每位选课的同学一学期缺席不能超过2次。否则没成绩。

第一板块主要为任课教师讲授，要求学生阅读布置的文献。

第二板块为精读训练。要求学生按照自己兴趣题目分组阅读，每位学生负担至少两个专题。打**是所有同学必须读的。 由各小组对负责的专题中的每篇文章进行细读。在课堂上每组成员分别就某1-2篇文章作细读报告。通过教师的不断提问和同学间的讨论，引导学生逐步学会如何抓住理论文献的要点，并对理论逻辑的复杂性展开充分分析。

第三板块为泛读训练。要求每位同学阅读全部文献。抓住文献如何对话，互相的差异如何。上课时候就教师提出的问题展开发挥和讨论。

第四板块：课程还将进行2-3次理论综述写作的讨论。要求学生首先阅读课程布置的理论综述范文。理解论文的写作方式。选择某一个理论领域写作初稿。在课上就初稿展开讨论。最终要求打磨出一篇具备发表水平的理论综述文章。

课程考核

1.理论文献综述作业：批判性的分析某一问题已有的理论进展。形成一个报告。-- 60%的成绩

2.教师会在课堂讨论的最后两周留意在课堂提问中考察学生的阅读进步情况。这并不是要求学生可以回答所有问题，而是主要看学生是不是有了进步。--40%的成绩

课程阅读与教学安排

第1周：课程介绍

1． 治理研究打开了新的理论化空间

2． 大纲梳理

3． 课程要求

第2周：反思中国治理研究的理论贫困：找回治理研究的理论想象力(带**为必读)

**Lily L. Tsai, Bringing in China: Insights for Building Comparative Political Theory, Comparative Political Studies, 2016, 50: 3, 295-328.

**Davis, Murray S. 1971 “That’s interesting: Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1(4): 309–344.

**米尔斯《社会学的想象力》，李康译，北京师范大学出版集团2017年，Pp 33-198

**Isaac Ariail Reed. “Ethnography, theory, and sociology as a human science: An interlocution”. Ethnography2017, Vol. 18(1) 107–129

King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.（阅读第1-3章）

Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2012). A Tale of Two Cultures: Quantitative and Qualitative Research in the Social Science. 中文版《两种传承: 社会科学中的定性与定量研究》第3-9章

Isaac Ariail Reed, Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences, The University of Chicago Press, 2011. Pp1-13; 89-162

Lisa Herzog and Bernardo Zacka. “Fieldwork in Political Theory: Five Arguments for an Ethnographic Sensibility” British Journal of Political Science 2017. Pp1-22

第二部分 理论视角 （第4-7周）

说明：第二部分主要训练学生的理论细读和思考能力。要求全体同学必须选择第5周的政治理论文献中的一个政治理论人物进行阅读。并选择其他三次课中的任意一次的所有阅读材料。分组后由每组在每次课上作阅读报告。要求抓出重要理论点，理清作者理论逻辑，并进行分析批判。

第3周：个体性视角

** Ronald Jepperson and John W. Meyer, Multiple Levels of Analysis and the Limitations of Methodological Individualisms, Sociological Theory, 2011, 29: 1, 54-73.

** Mustafa Emirbayer and Ann Mische, “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology, 1998, 103: 4, 962-1023.

** Margaret Levi, “Reconsiderations of Rational Choice in Comparative Politics and Historical Analysis,” in Mark I. Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, eds. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 117-133.

** Geraldo L. Munck, “Game Theory and Comparative Politics,” World Politics 53 (January 2001): 173-204.

Coordinating Futures: Toward a Theory of Anticipation, Iddo Tavory and Nina Eliasoph, American Journal of Sociology, 2013, 118: 4.

第4周：制度结构视角

** Peter A. Hall and Rosemary Taylor, “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms,” Political Studies, 44 (December 1996)

** Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change, Elisabeth S. Clemens and James M. Cook, Annual Review of Sociology, 1999, 25, 441-466.

** Paul Dimaggio and Walter Powell, “Introduction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press 1991. 1-40

** Peter A. Hall, “Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time.” Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2010.

Paul Pierson and Theda Skocpol, “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science,” in Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds. Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York: W.W. Norton, 2002), pp. 693-721.

Jonathan Rodden, “Back to the Future: Endogenous Institutions and Comparative Politics,” in Mark I. Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, eds. Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 333-357.

Gretchen Helmke and Steven Levitsky, “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2, No. 4 (2004): 725-740.

第5周：过程机制视角

** Social “Mechanisms” And Comparative-Historical Sociology: A Critical Realist Proposal, Philip Gorski, Frontiers of Sociology, 2009, 147-194

** Formation Stories and Causality in Sociology, Daniel Hirschman, Isaac Ariail Reed, Sociological Theory, 2014, 32: 4, 259-282.

**Neil Gross, “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms,” American Sociological Review 74 (June 2009): 358-79.

**Ivan Ermakoff, "The Structure of Contingency," American Journal of Sociology 121, no. 1 (July 2015): 64-125.

Mustafa Emirbayer, Manifesto for a Relational Sociology, American Journal of Sociology, 997, 103: 2, 281-317.

Charles Tilly, "To Explain Political Processes," American Journal of Sociology, 100, 6 (1995): 1594-1610.

Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). “Introduction”. Process tracing: from metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.

第6周：国家-社会视角

** Theda Skocpol, “ Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 1-43

**Michael Mann, “ A Theory of the Modern State” in Mann Michael The Sources of Social Power volume 2 The Rise of Classics and Nation-States, 1760-1914 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press )

** Timothy Mitchell, “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics,” American Political Science Review vol. 85 (March 1991), pp. 77-96.

** George Steinmetz ed., State/Culture: State- Formation after the Cultural Turn. Cornell University Press Pp1-35;98-118

“Hobbes”, in Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey, History of Political Philosophy.

Xu Xiaohong and Philip Gorski “The Culture of the Political: Towards a Cultural Sociology of State Formation”. John Hall, Laura Grindstaff and Ming-Cheng Lo ed. Handbook of Cultural Sociology. Pp535-546

肖瑛：《从“国家与社会”到“制度与生活”：中国社会变迁研究的视角转换》,《中国社会科学》2014年9期第88～104页

第7周：发展与现代性视角

**Huntington, Samuel, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968), pp. 1-92.

** Julia Adams, Elisabeth s. Clemens,and Ann Shola Orloff. “Introduction: Social Theory, Modernity, and the Three Waves of Historical Sociology” in Remaking Modernity Politics, History, and Sociology. Duke University Press 2005. 1-72

**Isaac Reed and Michael Weinman “ Agency, Power Modernity: A manifesto for Social Theory” European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 6:1, Pp6-50

**吉登斯 ：《社会的构成:结构化理论纲要》，李康、李猛翻译，中国人民大学出版社2017年，Pp 1-37;265-350

Giovanni Capoccia and Kelemen R. Daniel 2007. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism, , World Politic, 2007, 59: 3, 341-369.

Paul Pierson, “Big, Slow-Moving and Invisible…Macrosocial Processes in the Study of Comparative Politics” In James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (NY: Cambridge University Press 2003): 177-207.

Sewell, William, Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology. 98: 1-29.

第8周：文化视角

** Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” Pp. 3-30 in The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.

** Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review. 51: 273-286.

** Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday. Pp. 1-76.

** Meyer, John W. and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology. 83: 340-363.

** Sewell, William. 1999. “The Concept(s) of Culture.” Pp.35-61 in Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in the Study of Society and Culture, edited by Victoria E. Bonnell and Lynn Hunt. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Patterson, Orlando. 2010. “The Mechanisms of Cultural Reproduction: Explaining the Puzzle of Persistence.” In The Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by John Hall, et al. New York: Routledge. Chapter 13

Schudson, Michael. 1989. “How Culture Works: Perspectives from Media Studies on the Efficacy of Symbols.” Theory and Society. 18: 153-180.

Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckman. 1964. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday. Pp. 47-128.

Patterson, Orlando. 2000. “Taking Culture Seriously: A Framework and Afro-American Illustration.” Pp. 202-218 in Culture Matters, edited by Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington. New York: Basic Books.

第9周：权力视角

**韦伯：《支配社会学》第1-3章，《韦伯作品集》，广西师范大学出版社。

**Heinrich Popitz. Phenomena of Power: Authority, Domination and Violence. Columbia University Press. 1992 Pp I-22

**Isaac Ariail Reed. Power: Relational, Discursive, and Performative Dimensions, , Sociological Theory, 2013, 31: 3, 193-218.

**Jeffrey Alexander. “ Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy”, Sociological Theory Volume22, Issue4 Pp 527-573

Isaac Reed. Chains of Power and Their Representation Sociological Theory 2017 vol 35(2):87-117

第10周：匹配性视角

** Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 3-68.

** Colin Crouch Wolfgang Streeck Robert Boyer Bruno Amable Peter A. Hall Gregory Jackson, Dialogue on ‘Institutional complementarity and political economy’ Socio-Economic Review, Volume 3, Issue 2, 1 May 2005, Pages 359–382

** Martin Höpner. Epilogue to ‘Explaining Institutional Complementarity’ What Have We Learnt? Complementarity, Coherence and Institutional Change. Socio-Economic Review (2005) 3, 383–38

**Robert Dahl “American Hybrid” in Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition 2006.

Martin Höpner. What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity Socio-Economic Review, Volume 3, Issue 2, 1 May 2005, Pages 331–358

第11周：理论综述的写作讨论和选题报告

说明：请同学仔细阅读下面的理论综述范文，理解此类文章如何写作，并初步选择好自己关心的理论问题，上课汇报。

范文：

Daniel Ziblatt.“How Did Europe Democratize?” World Politics, Volume 58, Issue 2, January 2006 , pp. 311-338

Vu, Studying the state through state formation. World politics, 2010

King, RC Lieberman, “Ironies of State building: a comparative perspective on the American State”, World politics, 2009

Meg E. Rithmire “China's “New Regionalism”: Subnational Analysis in Chinese Political Economy” World Politics, Volume 66, Issue 1, pp. 165-194

第三部分：治理研究的中层理论

说明：要求每位同学阅读全部文献。但并不要求深入细致的阅读，而是训练如何迅速抓住大量文献间如何对话，互相的差异如何。上课时候就教师提出的问题展开发挥和讨论。第15-16周的两次讨论中，教师会根据学生学期的表现和进步程度给与讨论部分成绩。

第12周：政体差异与转型

Robert Dahl, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971), ch 1 (pp. 1-16), chapters 3-6 (pp. 33-104).

Seymour Martin Lipset, Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1960), chapter 2.

Adam Przeworski and Fernando Limongi, “Modernization: Theories and Facts,” World Politics, 49 (January 1997), pp. 155-183.

Dankwart Rustow, “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,” Comparative Politics, 2 (April 1970), pp. 337-364.

Carles Boix, Democracy and Redistribution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 1-59.

Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), chapters 2-3 (pp. 15-87)

Ziblatt, Daniel, “How Did Europe Democratize?” World Politics 58:2 (January 2006), 311-38.

Juan Linz, “The Perils of Presidentialism,” Journal of Democracy 1, No. 1 (Winter 1990).

Michael McFaul. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54, no.2 (January 2002): 212-244.

Jeffrey S. Kopstein and David A. Reilly. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 53, No. 1: 1-37.

Elisabeth Wood, "An Insurgent Path to Democracy: Popular Mobilization, Economic Interests and Regime Transition in South Africa and El Salvador.” Comparative Political Studies 34, No. 8 (October 2001): 862-888.

Dan Slater, “Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia,” American Journal of Sociology 115:1 (July 2009).

Michael Bratton and Nicolas Van de Walle, “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa,” World Politics 46, No. 4 (July 1994), pp. 453-489.

第13周：社会治理：组织与抗争

Mancur Olson, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard University Press, 1965), pp. 1-52

Sidney Tarrow, Power in Movement (Cambridge University Press, 1996), p. 9-27; 62-78.

John McCarthy and Mayer Zald, “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: a Partial Theory” American Journal of Sociology 82 (1977), pp. 1212-41.

Herbert Kitschelt, “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest,” British Journal of Political Science, 16 (1986), pp. 57-85.

Kevin O’Brien, “Rightful Resistance,” World Politics 49 (1) (1996): 31-55

Margaret E. Keck and Kathryn Sikkink, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Cornell University Press, 1997), pp.1-29;

Robert Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, 1993) (Chapters 3, 4, and 6), pp. 63-120; 163-185

Sheri Berman, “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic”, World Politics 49 (1997), pp. 401-439

Robert Putnam “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital,” Journal of Democracy (1995)

Theda Skocpol, Marshall Ganz, and Ziad Munson, “A Nation of Organizers: the Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States,” American Political Science Review 94 (3) (September 2000), pp. 527-546.

Lily Tsai, Solidary Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in Rural China", American Political Science Review 101, no.2 (May 2007), pp.355-372

第14周：国家建构

Stephen Krasner, “Approaches to the State,” Comparative Politics (January 1984), pp. 223-246

Douglas North. 1986. “A Neoclassical Theory of the State,” in Jon Elster, ed. Rational Choice (New York University Press, 1986), pp. 248-261.

Barbara Geddes, Politicians Dilemma (University of California Press, 1994), pp. 1-19.

Charles Tilly, “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime” in Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 169-191

Thomas Ertman, Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 1-34.

Desmond King and Robert Lieberman, “Ironies of State Building: A Comparative Perspective on the American State.” World Politics 61, No. 3 (July 2009): 547-588.

Robert Bates, Prosperity and Violence (2nd edition) (WW Norton, 2009), Chapters 3-4 (pp. 34-66).

Jeffrey Herbst, States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 12-31.

Miguel Centeno “Blood and Debt: War and Taxation in Nineteenth Century Latin America,” American Journal of Sociology 102 (6) 1997, pp. 1565-1605.

Dan Slater, “Can Leviathan be a Democrat? Competitive Elections, Robust Mass Politics, and State Infrastructural Power.” Studies in Comparative International Development 43:4 (December 2008), pp. 252-272

Anna Grzymala Busse, “The Discreet Charm of Formal Institutions: Postcommunist Party Competition and State Oversight,” Comparative Political Studies (December 2006), pp. 1-30.

Robert H. Bates, When Things Fall Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 3-6, 15-29, 97-139.

第15周：发展的政治经济学

W.W. Rostow, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1960] 1990), pp. 1-12

Gerschenkron, Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962), pp.5-30.

North, Douglas C., Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 83-104, 107-117.

Johnson, Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1982), pp. 3-34.

Alice Amsden, The Rise of “The Rest”: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 1-17, 125-160.

Robert H. Bates, Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agricultural Policies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), pp. 1-105.

Przeworski, Adam, and Michael Alvarez, José Antonio Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi, Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 142-179.

Jeffrey Sachs, “Tropical Underdevelopment,” NBER Working Paper (2001), pp. 1-40.

Dani Rodrik, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi, “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development” Journal of Economic Growth 9 (2004), pp. 131-158.

Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James Robinson, “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (2002): 1231-94.

第16周：福利国家与再分配的政治经济学

Allan H. Meltzer, and Scott. F. Richard, “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government,” Journal of Political Economy 89 (1981), 914-17 [Read only first 3 pages.]

Harold Wilensky, Rich Democracies (University of California Press, 2002), pp. 3-14.

Evelyne Huber and John D. Stephens, Development and Crisis of the Welfare State (University of Chicago Press, 2001), pp. 14-32.

Peter Katzenstein, Small States in World Markets (Cornell University Press, 1985) Chapter 1 (pp. 17-38) and Chapter 3 (pp. 80-135).

Gösta Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton University Press, 1990), Chapters 1-3 (pp. 1-78).

Torben Iversen and David Soskice, “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others,” American Political Science Review 100:2 (2006):165-181.

Manow, Philip, “Electoral Rules, Class Coalitions, and Welfare State Regimes, or how to Explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan” Socio-Economic Review (2009) 7: 101-121

Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, Varieties of Capitalism (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 3-68.

Geoffrey Garrett and Peter Lange, “Political Responses to Interdependence: What’s ‘left’ for the Left?” International Organization 45, No. 4 (Autumn): 539-564.

Paul Pierson, “The New Politics of the Welfare State,” World Politics (1996): 143-179.

Jacob Hacker, “Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State,” American Political Science Review 98, No. 4 (2004): 243-260.

第17-18周：理论文献综述报告会

说明：在第一次报告的基础上，这次要求同学详细提出自己阅读的理论领域，体现本学期理论教学培训需要具有的精读和泛读能力。根据讨论，学生利用暑假时间完善理论综述，在2019年秋季学期开学前交出最终作业（具体截止期另行通知）。最终作业字数不限、中英文均可。