侦探小说20条准则
最近每晚睡前看一篇侦探小说(傅惟慈主编,上海文艺的三卷本“外国现代惊险小说选集”:《长眠不醒》、《诺言》、《一只出卖的枪》),感觉很过瘾。学者南帆的《沉入词语》中论及余华的《河边的错误》时提到侦探小说创作的定律、准则,时长日久,只记得一条侦探不能是罪犯。刚才谷歌了一下,原来是这个:
侦探小说20条准则
文/(美)S·范丹
侦探小说是一种智力的竞赛。作者和读者斗智,像玩桥牌一样,得循规蹈矩,不能使用欺诈的伎俩。它的构思要新颖独到,布局要合情合理,这样才能吸引读者,同时使他们输得心服口服。写侦探小说有许多规例,这些规例是不成文的,但是很明确,这是每一个稍有自尊和尊重读者的作家都应该遵从的。
以下我列出二十戒条,乃经验所得,仅供有志写侦探小说的朋友参考:
1.作者应该把所有线索交待得一清二楚,使读者和书中的侦探具有同等的破案机会。
2.读者所受到的蒙骗应该仅止于罪犯施诸侦探本身的那些诡计。
3.侦探小说不应该扯上暖昧和爱情;否则就纠缠不清,使一场纯粹智力的竞赛复杂化。侦探小说的任务,是把罪犯绳之以法,而不是为了使有情人终成眷属。
4.犯罪的人不应该是侦探本人,或者是警方干探中的一员。这是一种欺骗读者的卑鄙手段。
5.破案要靠逻辑推理,不能凭意外或者巧合。假如是罪犯自首的话,动机应该充分。否则,就有如哄骗读者去寻宝,到他放弃时,才让他知道宝藏竟在他的口袋里,这种玩笑是开不得的。
6.侦探小说当然不能没有一个查案的侦探。侦探搜集蛛丝马迹,加以分析,最后揭露坏蛋的真正身份。侦探一定要靠分析线索来破案,否则就和小学生偷抄习题答案没有区别了。
7.罪案一定要是谋杀案。谋杀案越血腥越残酷,效果就越好。比谋杀案轻微的案件实在不值得读者花费精神和时间去翻300多页书。美国人爱讲人道主义,一宗恐怖的一级谋杀案必定会激起他们的义愤。哪怕是多么宽厚善良的读者也不会甘心让凶手逍遥法外,势必兴致勃勃地投入追查。
8.破案的方法要合情合理。诸如读心术、扶乩、招灵、看水晶球那类的巫术,乃是侦探小说之禁忌。和读者斗智的应该是个凡人。读者在玄学的第四维空间里和神仙、幽灵斗法,又岂有得胜的机会呢?
9.进行推理破案的主角只可有一个。假如动用三四个、甚至是一群侦探来思考,不但会分散了读者的注意力,而且会打乱本来连贯的思路。读者不知道和自己斗智的对手是谁,就会感到额外的困难。再者,读者要以一敌众,车轮大战,会感到疲于奔命。
10.罪犯应该是个举足轻重的人物。这个人物至少应该是读者所熟识,并曾经引起过兴趣的。将罪责推到一个从未出现过的人物或者无关痛痒的角色,是作者的一种无能的表现。
11.凶手不可是仆人、看门、跑腿、侍从、护林人、厨师这类的人,因其犯下的罪案是不值得写成书的。否则读者会觉得白白浪费了时间。凶手最好是个平时不会受到怀疑的重要人物。
12.谋杀案可以有很多宗,但罪犯只宜有一个。同谋和帮凶是可以有的,但是罪责一定要集中、归咎到一个黑心肠的凶手身上。这样,读者的义愤才有宣泄的对象。
13.在侦探小说中加进黑社会内容,会把罪责分散,这样只会糟蹋一宗本来十分精彩的谋杀案。一旦牵涉及黑手党、剑魔罗刹匪帮这类的黑社会集团,小说实际上已变成惊险小说或警匪小说,不再是侦探小说了。罪犯当然要有个机会作公平争斗,但让他有黑社会作靠山就过分了点。一般稍有自尊的高级谋杀犯是不屑与黑帮同流合污的。
14.犯罪和破案的方法都要合乎科学。换句话来说,假科学和纯粹想象出来的杀人方法一定要避免。毒药要出自《药典》。“超镭”这类的新发现元素只存在于作者想象之中,同样是不适用于侦探小说的。作者一旦像儒勒 凡尔纳那样异想天开,就已经是越出了侦探小说的范畴,闯进幻想小说的领域去了。
15.罪犯的真相,在阅读小说的过程中应该颇为明显,瞒不过特别聪明的读者。一般的读者假如在获悉真相之后把小说再看一遍,他会发现真相原来一直都摆在他的眼前。一个有如侦探一样精明的读者,不用把小说读到结局就能料到凶手的身份,这样的读者实在不乏其人。一本构思得合情合理的侦探小说是无法将真相瞒过所有读者的,总有读者比作者更敏锐聪明。假若作者把案件和所有线索都交待得清清楚楚,读者凭着独立分析,淘汰排除和逻辑推理等方法,应该可以和侦探同时指出真凶的身份。这就是侦探小说除情节动人之外,会有那么多不屑看流行小说的人也毫不脸红、津津有味地看侦探小说的另一原因。
16.侦探小说不宜有大段的描写和借题发挥,累赘的人物性格刻画和气氛的营造。这些东西只会使情节呆滞,妨碍推理,就像在球赛中间高歌自然之美或者在填字游戏时大谈词源的缀字学那样令人讨厌。侦探小说是要陈述案情,加以分析,进而得出结论的。读者阅读侦探小说,追求的不是动人肺腑的抒情、华丽词藻的描写,而是紧张刺激的斗智娱乐。适量的描写和人物刻画是需要的,但只要能使故事有真实感,读者能够投入,就已经足够了。
17.凶手不应该是个职业罪犯。劫匪小偷犯下的凶杀案由警局凶杀科处理就可以了,用不着有劳作家和业余侦探爱好者。凶手的声誉越显赫越炒,道貌岸然的教会支柱、社团栋梁或以乐善好施闻名的独身富婆乃上佳人选。
18.假如读者到最后发觉罪案竟是一宗自杀案或意外事件,定会大大地失望。这样一个反高潮的结局,实在有负读者的厚望。读者不但会向作者讨还书价,还会严厉惩罚这作者。
19.侦探小说里的谋杀应该出于私人动机。国际大阴谋或间谍之间的残杀内容属另外一类的小说。谋杀案应有现实感,使读者能投入,有一个机会去宣泄内心压抑已久的感情。
20.下面列出10种用滥了的模式。一个稍有自尊而勇于创新的小说作者都会不屑采用。
(1)侦探凭着比较在案发现场遗留下来的烟头和疑犯吸的香烟牌子来破案;
(2)侦探制造幽灵还魂的假像来恐吓嫌疑犯,使其露出马脚;
(3)凶犯利用伪造的手指模来欺骗警方;
(4)凶犯用假人来制造不在现场证据;
(5)侦探凭着狗没有吠这个现象,推断潜入者是熟人;
(6)真凶原来是无辜被告的孪生兄弟或长得一模一样的近亲;
(7)使用皮下注射器和蒙汗药;
(8)密室谋杀案在警方破门而人之后才发生的;
(9)通过测字联想来破案;
(10)凭着弄懂一封用密码写的信来破案。
侦探小说20条准则
文/(美)S·范丹
侦探小说是一种智力的竞赛。作者和读者斗智,像玩桥牌一样,得循规蹈矩,不能使用欺诈的伎俩。它的构思要新颖独到,布局要合情合理,这样才能吸引读者,同时使他们输得心服口服。写侦探小说有许多规例,这些规例是不成文的,但是很明确,这是每一个稍有自尊和尊重读者的作家都应该遵从的。
以下我列出二十戒条,乃经验所得,仅供有志写侦探小说的朋友参考:
1.作者应该把所有线索交待得一清二楚,使读者和书中的侦探具有同等的破案机会。
2.读者所受到的蒙骗应该仅止于罪犯施诸侦探本身的那些诡计。
3.侦探小说不应该扯上暖昧和爱情;否则就纠缠不清,使一场纯粹智力的竞赛复杂化。侦探小说的任务,是把罪犯绳之以法,而不是为了使有情人终成眷属。
4.犯罪的人不应该是侦探本人,或者是警方干探中的一员。这是一种欺骗读者的卑鄙手段。
5.破案要靠逻辑推理,不能凭意外或者巧合。假如是罪犯自首的话,动机应该充分。否则,就有如哄骗读者去寻宝,到他放弃时,才让他知道宝藏竟在他的口袋里,这种玩笑是开不得的。
6.侦探小说当然不能没有一个查案的侦探。侦探搜集蛛丝马迹,加以分析,最后揭露坏蛋的真正身份。侦探一定要靠分析线索来破案,否则就和小学生偷抄习题答案没有区别了。
7.罪案一定要是谋杀案。谋杀案越血腥越残酷,效果就越好。比谋杀案轻微的案件实在不值得读者花费精神和时间去翻300多页书。美国人爱讲人道主义,一宗恐怖的一级谋杀案必定会激起他们的义愤。哪怕是多么宽厚善良的读者也不会甘心让凶手逍遥法外,势必兴致勃勃地投入追查。
8.破案的方法要合情合理。诸如读心术、扶乩、招灵、看水晶球那类的巫术,乃是侦探小说之禁忌。和读者斗智的应该是个凡人。读者在玄学的第四维空间里和神仙、幽灵斗法,又岂有得胜的机会呢?
9.进行推理破案的主角只可有一个。假如动用三四个、甚至是一群侦探来思考,不但会分散了读者的注意力,而且会打乱本来连贯的思路。读者不知道和自己斗智的对手是谁,就会感到额外的困难。再者,读者要以一敌众,车轮大战,会感到疲于奔命。
10.罪犯应该是个举足轻重的人物。这个人物至少应该是读者所熟识,并曾经引起过兴趣的。将罪责推到一个从未出现过的人物或者无关痛痒的角色,是作者的一种无能的表现。
11.凶手不可是仆人、看门、跑腿、侍从、护林人、厨师这类的人,因其犯下的罪案是不值得写成书的。否则读者会觉得白白浪费了时间。凶手最好是个平时不会受到怀疑的重要人物。
12.谋杀案可以有很多宗,但罪犯只宜有一个。同谋和帮凶是可以有的,但是罪责一定要集中、归咎到一个黑心肠的凶手身上。这样,读者的义愤才有宣泄的对象。
13.在侦探小说中加进黑社会内容,会把罪责分散,这样只会糟蹋一宗本来十分精彩的谋杀案。一旦牵涉及黑手党、剑魔罗刹匪帮这类的黑社会集团,小说实际上已变成惊险小说或警匪小说,不再是侦探小说了。罪犯当然要有个机会作公平争斗,但让他有黑社会作靠山就过分了点。一般稍有自尊的高级谋杀犯是不屑与黑帮同流合污的。
14.犯罪和破案的方法都要合乎科学。换句话来说,假科学和纯粹想象出来的杀人方法一定要避免。毒药要出自《药典》。“超镭”这类的新发现元素只存在于作者想象之中,同样是不适用于侦探小说的。作者一旦像儒勒 凡尔纳那样异想天开,就已经是越出了侦探小说的范畴,闯进幻想小说的领域去了。
15.罪犯的真相,在阅读小说的过程中应该颇为明显,瞒不过特别聪明的读者。一般的读者假如在获悉真相之后把小说再看一遍,他会发现真相原来一直都摆在他的眼前。一个有如侦探一样精明的读者,不用把小说读到结局就能料到凶手的身份,这样的读者实在不乏其人。一本构思得合情合理的侦探小说是无法将真相瞒过所有读者的,总有读者比作者更敏锐聪明。假若作者把案件和所有线索都交待得清清楚楚,读者凭着独立分析,淘汰排除和逻辑推理等方法,应该可以和侦探同时指出真凶的身份。这就是侦探小说除情节动人之外,会有那么多不屑看流行小说的人也毫不脸红、津津有味地看侦探小说的另一原因。
16.侦探小说不宜有大段的描写和借题发挥,累赘的人物性格刻画和气氛的营造。这些东西只会使情节呆滞,妨碍推理,就像在球赛中间高歌自然之美或者在填字游戏时大谈词源的缀字学那样令人讨厌。侦探小说是要陈述案情,加以分析,进而得出结论的。读者阅读侦探小说,追求的不是动人肺腑的抒情、华丽词藻的描写,而是紧张刺激的斗智娱乐。适量的描写和人物刻画是需要的,但只要能使故事有真实感,读者能够投入,就已经足够了。
17.凶手不应该是个职业罪犯。劫匪小偷犯下的凶杀案由警局凶杀科处理就可以了,用不着有劳作家和业余侦探爱好者。凶手的声誉越显赫越炒,道貌岸然的教会支柱、社团栋梁或以乐善好施闻名的独身富婆乃上佳人选。
18.假如读者到最后发觉罪案竟是一宗自杀案或意外事件,定会大大地失望。这样一个反高潮的结局,实在有负读者的厚望。读者不但会向作者讨还书价,还会严厉惩罚这作者。
19.侦探小说里的谋杀应该出于私人动机。国际大阴谋或间谍之间的残杀内容属另外一类的小说。谋杀案应有现实感,使读者能投入,有一个机会去宣泄内心压抑已久的感情。
20.下面列出10种用滥了的模式。一个稍有自尊而勇于创新的小说作者都会不屑采用。
(1)侦探凭着比较在案发现场遗留下来的烟头和疑犯吸的香烟牌子来破案;
(2)侦探制造幽灵还魂的假像来恐吓嫌疑犯,使其露出马脚;
(3)凶犯利用伪造的手指模来欺骗警方;
(4)凶犯用假人来制造不在现场证据;
(5)侦探凭着狗没有吠这个现象,推断潜入者是熟人;
(6)真凶原来是无辜被告的孪生兄弟或长得一模一样的近亲;
(7)使用皮下注射器和蒙汗药;
(8)密室谋杀案在警方破门而人之后才发生的;
(9)通过测字联想来破案;
(10)凭着弄懂一封用密码写的信来破案。
热门话题 · · · · · · ( 去话题广场 )
- 端午吃什么585篇内容 · 4.2万次浏览
- 假期必备书影音清单307篇内容 · 8.4万次浏览
- 端午去哪儿255篇内容 · 1.4万次浏览
- 想做的事,别等“以后”1.0万+篇内容 · 374.7万次浏览
- 我的假期好搭子89篇内容 · 2.8万次浏览
- 重新养一遍自己,可真好啊1568篇内容 · 185.2万次浏览
- 分享你的健康减肥法新5055篇内容 · 4.0万次浏览
- 分享你crush的蓝调瞬间958篇内容 · 3.6万次浏览
"Twenty rules for writing detective stories" (1928)
(Originally published in the American Magazine (1928-sep), and included in the Philo Vance investigates omnibus (1936). by S.S. Van Dine (pseud. for Willard Huntington Wright)
THE DETECTIVE story is a kind of intellectual game. It is more — it is a sporting event. And for the writing of detective stories there are very definite laws — unwritten, perhaps, but none the less binding; and every respectable and self-respecting concocter of literary mysteries lives up to them. Herewith, then, is a sort Credo, based partly on the practice of all the great writers of detective stories, and partly on the promptings of the honest author's inner conscience. To wit:
The reader must have equal opportunity with the detective for solving the mystery. All clues must be plainly stated and described.
No willful tricks or deceptions may be placed on the reader other than those played legitimately by the criminal on the detective himself.
There must be no love interest. The business in hand is to bring a criminal to the bar of justice, not to bring a lovelorn couple to the hymeneal altar.
The detective himself, or one of the official investigators, should never turn out to be the culprit. This is bald trickery, on a par with offering some one a bright penny for a five-dollar gold piece. It's false pretenses.
The culprit must be determined by logical deductions — not by accident or coincidence or unmotivated confession. To solve a criminal problem in this latter fashion is like sending the reader on a deliberate wild-goose chase, and then telling him, after he has failed, that you had the object of his search up your sleeve all the time. Such an author is no better than a practical joker.
The detective novel must have a detective in it; and a detective is not a detective unless he detects. His function is to gather clues that will eventually lead to the person who did the dirty work in the first chapter; and if the detective does not reach his conclusions through an analysis of those clues, he has no more solved his problem than the schoolboy who gets his answer out of the back of the arithmetic.
There simply must be a corpse in a detective novel, and the deader the corpse the better. No lesser crime than murder will suffice. Three hundred pages is far too much pother for a crime other than murder. After all, the reader's trouble and expenditure of energy must be rewarded.
The problem of the crime must he solved by strictly naturalistic means. Such methods for learning the truth as slate-writing, ouija-boards, mind-reading, spiritualistic se'ances, crystal-gazing, and the like, are taboo. A reader has a chance when matching his wits with a rationalistic detective, but if he must compete with the world of spirits and go chasing about the fourth dimension of metaphysics, he is defeated ab initio.
There must be but one detective — that is, but one protagonist of deduction — one deus ex machina. To bring the minds of three or four, or sometimes a gang of detectives to bear on a problem, is not only to disperse the interest and break the direct thread of logic, but to take an unfair advantage of the reader. If there is more than one detective the reader doesn't know who his codeductor is. It's like making the reader run a race with a relay team.
The culprit must turn out to be a person who has played a more or less prominent part in the story — that is, a person with whom the reader is familiar and in whom he takes an interest.
A servant must not be chosen by the author as the culprit. This is begging a noble question. It is a too easy solution. The culprit must be a decidedly worth-while person — one that wouldn't ordinarily come under suspicion.
There must be but one culprit, no matter how many murders are committed. The culprit may, of course, have a minor helper or co-plotter; but the entire onus must rest on one pair of shoulders: the entire indignation of the reader must be permitted to concentrate on a single black nature.
Secret societies, camorras, mafias, et al., have no place in a detective story. A fascinating and truly beautiful murder is irremediably spoiled by any such wholesale culpability. To be sure, the murderer in a detective novel should be given a sporting chance; but it is going too far to grant him a secret society to fall back on. No high-class, self-respecting murderer would want such odds.
The method of murder, and the means of detecting it, must be be rational and scientific. That is to say, pseudo-science and purely imaginative and speculative devices are not to be tolerated in the roman policier. Once an author soars into the realm of fantasy, in the Jules Verne manner, he is outside the bounds of detective fiction, cavorting in the uncharted reaches of adventure.
The truth of the problem must at all times be apparent — provided the reader is shrewd enough to see it. By this I mean that if the reader, after learning the explanation for the crime, should reread the book, he would see that the solution had, in a sense, been staring him in the face-that all the clues really pointed to the culprit — and that, if he had been as clever as the detective, he could have solved the mystery himself without going on to the final chapter. That the clever reader does often thus solve the problem goes without saying.
A detective novel should contain no long descriptive passages, no literary dallying with side-issues, no subtly worked-out character analyses, no "atmospheric" preoccupations. such matters have no vital place in a record of crime and deduction. They hold up the action and introduce issues irrelevant to the main purpose, which is to state a problem, analyze it, and bring it to a successful conclusion. To be sure, there must be a sufficient descriptiveness and character delineation to give the novel verisimilitude.
A professional criminal must never be shouldered with the guilt of a crime in a detective story. Crimes by housebreakers and bandits are the province of the police departments — not of authors and brilliant amateur detectives. A really fascinating crime is one committed by a pillar of a church, or a spinster noted for her charities.
A crime in a detective story must never turn out to be an accident or a suicide. To end an odyssey of sleuthing with such an anti-climax is to hoodwink the trusting and kind-hearted reader.
The motives for all crimes in detective stories should be personal. International plottings and war politics belong in a different category of fiction — in secret-service tales, for instance. But a murder story must be kept gemütlich, so to speak. It must reflect the reader's everyday experiences, and give him a certain outlet for his own repressed desires and emotions.
And (to give my Credo an even score of items) I herewith list a few of the devices which no self-respecting detective story writer will now avail himself of. They have been employed too often, and are familiar to all true lovers of literary crime. To use them is a confession of the author's ineptitude and lack of originality. (a) Determining the identity of the culprit by comparing the butt of a cigarette left at the scene of the crime with the brand smoked by a suspect. (b) The bogus spiritualistic se'ance to frighten the culprit into giving himself away. (c) Forged fingerprints. (d) The dummy-figure alibi. (e) The dog that does not bark and thereby reveals the fact that the intruder is familiar. (f)The final pinning of the crime on a twin, or a relative who looks exactly like the suspected, but innocent, person. (g) The hypodermic syringe and the knockout drops. (h) The commission of the murder in a locked room after the police have actually broken in. (i) The word association test for guilt. (j) The cipher, or code letter, which is eventually unraveled by the sleuth.
正在读侦探小说,看看这么多戒律是否用得上
《长眠不醒》、《诺言》、《一只出卖的枪》(傅惟慈主编,上海文艺的三卷本“外国现代惊险小说选集)是很多人的侦探小说启蒙读物,我书架上现在还有。
侦探小说仅仅是侦探小说吗?
我们要找的仅仅是那个人吗?
哈哈。。。。。。。