心理学测试：你是否有城府？
尾生
在复杂人际关系中，数理化公式神马的都失效了。正常人是通过边缘系统等情绪中枢来对策、判断的。这种复杂使得看似愚蠢的政客、老板在政坛、经济界游刃有余。 INTx是否能在社会中生存适应呢？ 其实就是翻牌50次或者100次。我的得分是2950，请各位跟帖一定要注明： 得分：9999 性别： 测试网站： Iowa Gambling Task Demo A demonstration of the Iowa Gambling Task originally developed by Bechara, Damasio, Tranel and Anderson (1994). http://www.millisecond.com/download/samples/v3/IowaGamblingTask/IowaGamblingTask.web 科普片字幕： Emotional experiences make us who we are. Our own personal histories are woven into the fabric of our brains. But it's not just moments of extreme emotion that leave their mark. Every day the after shocks of past emotional upheavals are influencing our actions. As we go through life these after shocks are silently nudging us towards decisions. We are oblivious to this process, but every moment of our lives we are influenced by the foot prints of our past. [Prof. Antonio Damasio] : Emotion is about value emotion is about what's good, what's evil, what's pleasant, what's unpleasant, what's painful, what's pleasurable. If you take away that, you do not have a value system to operate effectively. Here in Chicago neurologist Antonio Damasio has done some insightful studies into the role of emotions in everyday life. [Prof. Antonio Damasio] : We're going to play this interesting gambling task. He's interested in how emotions influence us at those times when we feel at our most logical, when we're trying to make difficult decisions. And he's invented a gambling game to prove his point. I turn over cards and either win or lose money, but he doesn't tell me why. The payouts vary wildly, they're deliberately designed to confuse. So there's some rule operating here that I can't work out. OK. Another black. And you're going to get $50 as well. I'm baffled, but determined to work out which packs are paying out more. It's very tempting to just do it randomly, but that's completely non logical to do that. I can't see any relationship between what I'm doing and what's happening to me. A bit like life I suppose, OK, so A. That is going to be, I'm afraid to say, 1,250 to me. But I will give you a hundred. Well that's just being kind or... No no, that's just the rules. I'm trying my best to unravel the rules of the game, but the pattern of pay outs is so complicated, I can't work it out logically. So I'm forced to use something else - my emotions. Although they give the highest rewards, I get the feeling that packs A and B also seem to inflict more damage. And that steers me way from them. I'm being guided by emotionally loaded but covert signals, what Damasio calls sematic markers. Eventually I adopt a more conservative policy, ...winning back my losses by sticking to packs C and D. That's going to be another 50 and that's the end. So how do you know it's the end? Oh because I decide. So what is odd is that I was trying to use all the logic within my abilities and trying different logical strategies but none of them seemed to work, none of them seemed adequate. There seems more to it than logic. [Prof. Antonio Damasio] : Logic alone really does not help you solve problems in which there is as much uncertainty as you had here. So what we do most of the time is that we use of course logic and we use knowledge, no question about it. But we also use something very smart, which is the experience that we've had in the past of certain situations and of the outcomes of certain actions that we have taken and the attached emotion. So when I'm deciding which pack to choose, I'm guided by the emotional consequences of my earlier decisions. These good or bad feelings, which Damasio calls semiotic markers, guide our choices. But I wasn't always aware of feeling anything when I was deciding which pack to choose. [Prof. Antonio Damasio] : When you confronted a very large penalty and you actually had to pay er quite a lot of money, that's an example of a semantic marker at a gut feeling level that's a very old idea, very traditional. But throughout most of the task you were actually not having that kind of signal; you were having something that was far more subtle, that was happening without you knowing below the level of consciousness. It's possible to measure these unconscious semantic markers. After a card turn, electrical sensors can pick up a tiny increase in sweat, indicating an emotional response to the result. But these changes are also detected just before the card turn as the actual decision is being made. So unconsciously emotions are guiding our every move. Emotions guide our behaviour. They make us want to do things. They are the driving force that becomes action that indescribable brain kick that makes what we do worth doing. Feelings motivate us to try, to care, to win. That rush, that thrill that makes certain moments so special. For scientists, the nature of subjective experience has always been slippery. How can you measure what you can barely describe? But now at last we're able to tackle the really big question - where does the actual feel of feelings come from? Reference: THOMPSON A. Brain Power [M]//SPENCER C. The Human Body. UK: BBC Inc. 1998: 48 minutes.
你的回复
回复请先 登录 , 或 注册
相关内容推荐
最新讨论 ( 更多 )
- intp和infj沟通的一个问题 (momo)
- 想听听intp的大家对于肖明韬的看法 (边走边记)
- intp们会不会觉得在朋友圈发旅游照片是一种装货的表现？ (memo)
- 脑洞瞎谈｜intp迷上一个东西是什么感觉？ (Sleepwalker029)
- 各位intp会不会觉得自己神经大条 (VIUL)