Literature Review：研究计划中极易忽视的环节

• 

  Gus Goodman (公众号：九牛问津) 楼主 2020-06-02 09:57:46

  本文为英国牛津大学【九牛问津】团队原创 (需转载请联系原作者)。团队由9名牛津大学在读硕博生组成，还包括几十名分布于英国 G5及罗素集团学校兼职的优秀硕博生。本系列文章旨在正留学三观，输出纯留学干货。更多留学内容可以关注公号【九牛问津】或者个人号：DY_941105，音频内容可见喜马拉雅号：【牛津学长说留学】。

  删除 |

  赞 回复
• 

  Gus Goodman (公众号：九牛问津) 楼主 2020-06-03 10:02:59

  所以在写完Literature Review 之后，大家也要好好问一下自己如下几个关键问题：

  ◆我的literature review 是否缺乏重点？是否有逻辑连贯性？

  ◆我是否对literature进行了批判性的评估？

  ◆我的literature review 能否体现我对于这个领域的全面了解？

  ◆我的literature review 能否明确地向读者展现目前该领域的knowledge gap?

  口说无凭，还是直接上案例分析（本文所有案例均模糊处理了相关的学术信息，只展现行文的框架）

  XXXXX, written byXX(1849-1922) was published in 1920, was the first monograph that documentedXXXXXX. Most of the materials in this book (especially its Vol.2) draw from archives of the Municipal Council of Shanghai, which provides a reference source for the later studies on Shanghai’s concessions,suchas XXXXX and XXXXX. These two books are referred by my research when it comes to discussions on XXXXXXX. XXXXX like an encyclopedia about Shanghai, and the chapter XXXXX mainly shows how Japan gradually replaced Britain and France in controlling Shanghai at the military, financial, and political levels completely between 1937 and 1945. The data of price and population make me have a reasonable argument basis when discussing XXXXXX. Additionally, I would like to put forward XXXX and XXXXX, which were born in the wave of Shanghai studies in recent years. They do not conform to the specifications of intellectual works but turn to the civic culture by oral history. Although they seem to be relatively loose, fragmented and life-style when presenting XXXX, they inspire me to pay more attention to XXXXX.

  删除 |

  赞 回复
• 

  Gus Goodman (公众号：九牛问津) 楼主 2020-06-04 09:37:47

  点评：

  ◆经过团队RP小伙伴的重新梳理，选取并总结了与学生研究领域最相关以及最核心的文献；

  ◆整个段落围绕研究领域的一个侧面展开，不仅探讨了核心的文献和研究进展，也讨论了这些研究共同的gap，整个段落在逻辑上更为紧凑和连贯；

  ◆用语和用词显得学术、明确、流畅；即便是非专业人士，也可以很好地了解该领域的背景知识。

  删除 |

  赞 回复
• 

  Gus Goodman (公众号：九牛问津) 楼主 2020-06-05 10:51:26

  里再举一个好的案例供大家参考：

  Thestudies of XXXX generally focused on the following aspects:Before 1980s, there were two main arguments. First, XXXX were regarded as XXXXX since the XXXX was unique, an argument that could be easily found in archives complied by XXXXXX. These group of scholarsclaims that XXXXXX. Second, most XXX scholars support the claim that XXXXX . The bone of contention is XXXXX. However, the XXXX were not merely XXXXX , but were launched in a more complex context where XXX and XXXX as well as XXXXX all played their parts in the XXXXX. 虽然只有短短一段，而且看似使用的文献并不是很多，但是行文结构清晰，对于研究文献和内容分类明确，正恰恰体现了学生扎实的学术基本功。无论是写学术文章还是留学文书，并不是字数越多、内容越多越好；往往越精炼的文字和语言，以及越清晰的行文逻辑，越需要我们付出更多的时间和精力；因为只有对于该领域有一个全面和深入的了解之后，我们才能达到高屋建瓴、把握全局的能力，才能写出一篇精炼和有说服力的research proposal。

  俗话说：“台上一分钟，台下十年功。”做任何事、写任何文章皆是如此，留学也不例外。

  删除 |

  赞 回复

你的回复

回复请先 登录 , 或 注册