Stavrogin
Stavrogin的音乐 · · · · · · ( 16张听过 )
听过
Stavrogin的评论 · · · · · · · · · · ( 评论18 )
- Sleeper是人吗？
-
-
Stavrogin
评论:
深空梦里人 Citizen Sleeper
Ethan这个角色的故事写得真好，让我想到DE里的那几个雇佣兵。GDM说这个角色的一个灵感来源是《赛博朋克2077》，他想提供一个观察雇佣兵也就是V这种人的另类视角。这启发了我意识到自己无法接受CDPR围绕V构建的叙...
- Progress and Decline
-
-
Stavrogin
评论:
深入 Inside
Gareth Damian Martin（Citizen Sleeper的制作人，以前是从事游戏批评的撰稿人）在接受Point 'N Think的采访时提到了Inside的空间设计。他当时一边玩游戏，一边随流程绘制出了游戏大致的空间结构，通关以后发现，...
„Das Ganze ist das Unwahre.“
„Es gibt kein richtiges Leben im falschen.“
„Wer ein ‘etwas’ wird, setzt voraus, daß er nicht weiß, was er wird. Aus dieser Perspektive haben selbst die Fehler des Lebens – die vorübergehenden Umwege und falschen Wendungen, die Verzögerungen, die ‘Bescheidenheiten’, die Ernsthaftigkeit, die auf Aufgaben verschwendet wird, die nicht die eigene Aufgabe sind – ihren eigenen Wert und ihre eigene Bedeutung.“
“Obedience is a political virtue of the first order, and without it no body politic could survive. Unrestricted freedom of conscience exists nowhere, for it would spell the doom of every organized community. All this sounds so plausible that it takes some effort to detect the fallacy. Its plausibility rests on the truth that 'all governments,' in the words of Madison, even the most autocratic ones, even tyrannies, 'rest on consent,' and the fallacy lies in the equation of consent with obedience. An adult consents where a child obeys; if an adult is said to obey, he actually supports the organization or the authority or the law that claims 'obedience.'"
"Thought itself is already a sign of resistance, of the effort to allow oneself no longer to be deceived."
“It is not technology or the motive of self-preservation that in itself accounts for the decline of the individual; it is not production per se, but the forms in which it takes place—the interrelationships of human beings within the specific framework of industrialism. Human toil and research and invention is a response to the challenge of necessity. The pattern becomes absurd only when people make toil, research, and invention into idols. Such an ideology tends to supplant the humanistic foundation of the very civilization it seeks to glorify. While the concepts of complete fulfilment and unrestrained enjoyment fostered a hope that unshackled the forces of progress, the idolization of progress leads to the opposite of progress. Arduous labor for a meaningful end may be enjoyed and even loved. A philosophy that makes labor an end in itself leads eventually to resentment of all labor.”
“I think we ought to read only the kind of books that wound and stab us. If the book we’re reading doesn’t wake us up with a blow on the head, what are we reading it for? So that it will make us happy, as you write? Good Lord, we would be happy precisely if we had no books, and the kind of books that make us happy are the kind we could write ourselves if we had to. But we need the books that affect us like a disaster, that grieve us deeply, like the death of someone we loved more than ourselves, like being banished into forests far from everyone, like a suicide. A book must be the axe for the frozen sea inside us. That is my belief.”
“客亦知夫水与月乎？逝者如斯，而未尝往也；盈虚者如彼，而卒莫消长也。盖将自其变者而观之，则天地曾不能以一瞬；自其不变者而观之，则物与我皆无尽也，而又何羡乎？且夫天地之间，物各有主，苟非吾之所有，虽一毫而莫取。惟江上之清风，与山间之明月，耳得之而为声，目遇之而成色，取之无禁，用之不竭。是造物者之无尽藏也，而吾与子之所共适。”
“有我所不乐意的在天堂里，我不愿去；有我所不乐意的在地狱里，我不愿去；有我所不乐意的在你们将来的黄金世界里，我不愿去。/然而你就是我所不乐意的。/朋友，我不想跟随你了，我不愿住。/我不愿意！/呜呼呜呼，我不愿意，我不如彷徨于无地。”
„Es gibt kein richtiges Leben im falschen.“
„Wer ein ‘etwas’ wird, setzt voraus, daß er nicht weiß, was er wird. Aus dieser Perspektive haben selbst die Fehler des Lebens – die vorübergehenden Umwege und falschen Wendungen, die Verzögerungen, die ‘Bescheidenheiten’, die Ernsthaftigkeit, die auf Aufgaben verschwendet wird, die nicht die eigene Aufgabe sind – ihren eigenen Wert und ihre eigene Bedeutung.“
“Obedience is a political virtue of the first order, and without it no body politic could survive. Unrestricted freedom of conscience exists nowhere, for it would spell the doom of every organized community. All this sounds so plausible that it takes some effort to detect the fallacy. Its plausibility rests on the truth that 'all governments,' in the words of Madison, even the most autocratic ones, even tyrannies, 'rest on consent,' and the fallacy lies in the equation of consent with obedience. An adult consents where a child obeys; if an adult is said to obey, he actually supports the organization or the authority or the law that claims 'obedience.'"
"Thought itself is already a sign of resistance, of the effort to allow oneself no longer to be deceived."
“It is not technology or the motive of self-preservation that in itself accounts for the decline of the individual; it is not production per se, but the forms in which it takes place—the interrelationships of human beings within the specific framework of industrialism. Human toil and research and invention is a response to the challenge of necessity. The pattern becomes absurd only when people make toil, research, and invention into idols. Such an ideology tends to supplant the humanistic foundation of the very civilization it seeks to glorify. While the concepts of complete fulfilment and unrestrained enjoyment fostered a hope that unshackled the forces of progress, the idolization of progress leads to the opposite of progress. Arduous labor for a meaningful end may be enjoyed and even loved. A philosophy that makes labor an end in itself leads eventually to resentment of all labor.”
“I think we ought to read only the kind of books that wound and stab us. If the book we’re reading doesn’t wake us up with a blow on the head, what are we reading it for? So that it will make us happy, as you write? Good Lord, we would be happy precisely if we had no books, and the kind of books that make us happy are the kind we could write ourselves if we had to. But we need the books that affect us like a disaster, that grieve us deeply, like the death of someone we loved more than ourselves, like being banished into forests far from everyone, like a suicide. A book must be the axe for the frozen sea inside us. That is my belief.”
“客亦知夫水与月乎？逝者如斯，而未尝往也；盈虚者如彼，而卒莫消长也。盖将自其变者而观之，则天地曾不能以一瞬；自其不变者而观之，则物与我皆无尽也，而又何羡乎？且夫天地之间，物各有主，苟非吾之所有，虽一毫而莫取。惟江上之清风，与山间之明月，耳得之而为声，目遇之而成色，取之无禁，用之不竭。是造物者之无尽藏也，而吾与子之所共适。”
“有我所不乐意的在天堂里，我不愿去；有我所不乐意的在地狱里，我不愿去；有我所不乐意的在你们将来的黄金世界里，我不愿去。/然而你就是我所不乐意的。/朋友，我不想跟随你了，我不愿住。/我不愿意！/呜呼呜呼，我不愿意，我不如彷徨于无地。”
Stavrogin的广播 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 未登录无法查看更多内容 -
订阅Stavrogin的收藏:
feed: rss 2.0