It’s 1943 and the Germans are occupying the fictional East European country of Illyria. A young man named Hugo joins the Communist party to break with his bourgeois past. Convinced that he’s superfluous, Hugo looks to the collective nature of communism to give him a sense of belonging, and for an assignment to give his life purpose. He agrees to assassinate Hoederer, the party leader who is trying to create a pact with other non-socialist groups to oppose the Germans. Negotiating with these reactionary forces makes him a traitor in the eyes of Hugo and his comrades. Hugo takes a job as Hoede...
It’s 1943 and the Germans are occupying the fictional East European country of Illyria. A young man named Hugo joins the Communist party to break with his bourgeois past. Convinced that he’s superfluous, Hugo looks to the collective nature of communism to give him a sense of belonging, and for an assignment to give his life purpose. He agrees to assassinate Hoederer, the party leader who is trying to create a pact with other non-socialist groups to oppose the Germans. Negotiating with these reactionary forces makes him a traitor in the eyes of Hugo and his comrades. Hugo takes a job as Hoederer’s private secretary – he and his wife Jessica even live in the leader’s house. The closer Hugo gets to the charismatic Hoederer, the more he comes to admire him and seek his approval. Hugo keeps delaying the assassination. Only when he’s led to believe that Hoederer has seduced Jessica does Hugo shoot Hoederer. After being released from jail, Hugo insists that the murder was politically motivated, not a crime of passion. However, in the meantime, the political situation has changed.
Sartre’s drama, which made its debut in 1948, deals with communism and social conflict, as well as exposing the errors inherent in any ideology. “Dirty Hands” asks whether we should actively attempt to shape our society and, if so, how? It makes us question what kind of society we advocate and wonder whether there is a “right“ way to act in times of global economic and democratic crisis.
显示全部
1 有用 虎谿三跳 2020-08-08
「這不是一個政治劇,不帶任何程度的政治色彩」
0 有用 嘤嘤 2020-05-21
看之前认真过了一遍剧本,看之后挺失望的😞几乎看不到导演对形式的思考和创造,像是照着某种方法手册给剧本做插图,看上去充满新鲜元素,实际上温吞乏力,既无独特的美学意志也没有装配的意外之喜。景和bodó的培尔金特有点像,但完全相反的用法。我比较喜欢那种... 看之前认真过了一遍剧本,看之后挺失望的😞几乎看不到导演对形式的思考和创造,像是照着某种方法手册给剧本做插图,看上去充满新鲜元素,实际上温吞乏力,既无独特的美学意志也没有装配的意外之喜。景和bodó的培尔金特有点像,但完全相反的用法。我比较喜欢那种 (展开)
1 有用 快乐王子王铁头 2020-05-07
15年在DT看了两遍,如今再看更为客观了。DT这版优点和缺点同样突出,按当年演贺德雷师弟的话说就是:“我TM,德国导演这些私货,都不考虑会不会影响整体的吗?赫德雷跟雨果为什么接吻了?为什么!为什么!”... 15年在DT看了两遍,如今再看更为客观了。DT这版优点和缺点同样突出,按当年演贺德雷师弟的话说就是:“我TM,德国导演这些私货,都不考虑会不会影响整体的吗?赫德雷跟雨果为什么接吻了?为什么!为什么!” (展开)
0 有用 Mumu 2020-05-06
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1YZ4y1s7LS