2007-11-17 11:41:21
来自: hemingway
(北京)
The Economist的评论
Admittedly, nowadays china stock market is soaring inconceivable, basing on the economical circumstance, we shouldn’t neglect mass economists in the colleges and the investment corporations, they seem deified as a commander in the chart of demand and supply. As far as I concerned, the public investors are incline to convince the prediction from the authorities and the high reputation observers. However people maybe unknown of the economists who never succeed in portfolio, maybe they can provide the macro-economy strategy for creating a more mature market. Actually, most of economists don’t feel that the career takes responsibility for the living and the others. The faith of quasi-economists (such as the students in the business and the pragmatic volunteers in the market) is about to achieve a wealth project, which comprise of becoming a millionaire as Bill Gates, surrendering all the liabilities, economists always prophet the market change form their perspective, whose extremely contrary outcome is usual situation. That’s to say, in the market we confront to magnitude of information form the all corners.
If the any economist intended to control over the direction of investment partly, he or she will choose the authority rationally. Therefore, they will plug into the governments under socialism institution, so we usually observe the same situation in contemporary China, the market is so vulnerable in the regime of rigid government, only the revoke form the government, resonance is motivated, deposits is flowing out, so the bureaucracy has strengthened manipulating economy tactics, this is why the Beijing daren’t to break the traditional regulations to head to more democratic sovereignty and emancipate the ideas of liberalism, but the economists proceed to convey signal of soaring and booming continually and consistently, whether the shanghai stock-market will collapse or not. On the other hand, we indeed experienced the revolution leading to a prosperous economy, in the transaction and the deficit, even the inflation, Chinese government sustains a average level, especially in the market of yuan. Many western statesmen fabricated the development of china threaten the security of America, and in fact it’s what it’s did. The intimidation lead to the American deficit and unemployment partly, but standing on the prospect of the globalizationlist, the benefits and the malignance is neutral phenomenon, not involving the correction and the punishment, local protectionism has become a widespread tactics, which cause sorts of sanctions form UN and antagonists. There are many strategies in the commercial behaviors, such as the protection of export tax, labor cost maintenance, weaken industrial productions, market profits, etc.
However, the economists never pinpoint the intimidation to the America, they always created the non-intimidation for all the others countries, thinking the development of china will not give pressure to adjacent districts and holding the equality and fair principles to handle the thorny controversies. Maybe the sluggish economists should think out a resolution besides the earning.
> 我来回应
The Economist的评论
Admittedly, nowadays china stock market is soaring inconceivable, basing on the economical circumstance, we shouldn’t neglect mass economists in the colleges and the investment corporations, they seem deified as a commander in the chart of demand and supply. As far as I concerned, the public investors are incline to convince the prediction from the authorities and the high reputation observers. However people maybe unknown of the economists who never succeed in portfolio, maybe they can provide the macro-economy strategy for creating a more mature market. Actually, most of economists don’t feel that the career takes responsibility for the living and the others. The faith of quasi-economists (such as the students in the business and the pragmatic volunteers in the market) is about to achieve a wealth project, which comprise of becoming a millionaire as Bill Gates, surrendering all the liabilities, economists always prophet the market change form their perspective, whose extremely contrary outcome is usual situation. That’s to say, in the market we confront to magnitude of information form the all corners.
If the any economist intended to control over the direction of investment partly, he or she will choose the authority rationally. Therefore, they will plug into the governments under socialism institution, so we usually observe the same situation in contemporary China, the market is so vulnerable in the regime of rigid government, only the revoke form the government, resonance is motivated, deposits is flowing out, so the bureaucracy has strengthened manipulating economy tactics, this is why the Beijing daren’t to break the traditional regulations to head to more democratic sovereignty and emancipate the ideas of liberalism, but the economists proceed to convey signal of soaring and booming continually and consistently, whether the shanghai stock-market will collapse or not. On the other hand, we indeed experienced the revolution leading to a prosperous economy, in the transaction and the deficit, even the inflation, Chinese government sustains a average level, especially in the market of yuan. Many western statesmen fabricated the development of china threaten the security of America, and in fact it’s what it’s did. The intimidation lead to the American deficit and unemployment partly, but standing on the prospect of the globalizationlist, the benefits and the malignance is neutral phenomenon, not involving the correction and the punishment, local protectionism has become a widespread tactics, which cause sorts of sanctions form UN and antagonists. There are many strategies in the commercial behaviors, such as the protection of export tax, labor cost maintenance, weaken industrial productions, market profits, etc.
However, the economists never pinpoint the intimidation to the America, they always created the non-intimidation for all the others countries, thinking the development of china will not give pressure to adjacent districts and holding the equality and fair principles to handle the thorny controversies. Maybe the sluggish economists should think out a resolution besides the earning.
> 我来回应
本评论版权属于作者hemingway，并受法律保护。除非评论正文中另有声明，没有作者本人的书面许可任何人不得转载或使用整体或任何部分的内容。
The Economist
